Design For New US Embassy Building Revealed

2402_embassy.jpg

So what do we have here then: a giant-sized Apple Cube? A 21st century Kaaba? Or a Borg ship with a chintzy makeover by Jonathan Ive?

It is, of course, none of those, but rather the new US Embassy in Nine Elms, by Philadelphia-based firm KieranTimberlake, which has won the competition to design the $1 billion building.

The brief calls for a squat, 12-storey glass cube sitting atop a colonnade, surrounded by parkland and lakes which will be open to the public: an “urban building in an urban park”, to quote the architect. Many of America’s post-9/11 embassies in hotspots like Iraq and Pakistan have tilted toward a fortress-like bunker aesthetic, a trend criticised by some members of the diplomatic corps. The planned building avoids the foreboding reinforced concrete of recent years, in favour of a fierce-looking facade of blast-resistant glass and a polymer scrim (ETFE, for those who need to know).

Different it may look to other contemporary embassy designs, but that doesn’t mean it is any more interesting. As an urban park, with a moat and what looks like a drawbridge-style entrance, it seems ready to taunt the local population with medieval mischief: step into the king’s realm, and be prepared for a pinch. There are dark rumours that the winner has not enjoyed the support of all vested parties — the Obama administration is believed to favour a rival design, while competition juror Richard Rogers has reportedly called the plan “boring”.

A fair jab, perhaps, but what was he expecting? Recent geopolitical history has, with justification, driven the US to paranoia over the safety of its federal employees working overseas, and events in London over the past decade, not least the attempted Christmas Day bombing by a young Nigerian apparently radicalised at UCL, have validated those fears. As a piece of architecture, it lacks the joy of the Saarinen building that will be vacated, but as a practical response to an embassy’s function, the cube does, sadly, have some merit.

Building work is expected to commence in 2013 for completion by 2017.

More pictures and a video flythrough at Building Design

  • http://undefined sinisterpictures

    I’m surprised it’s not just a massive cube of reinforced concrete surrounded by a moat with point defence miniguns all over it.

  • http://undefined M@

    On a superficial level, I really like this. It’s distinctive and memorable without being overbearing. And I love the way it’s going to draw Borg-cube comparisons. Also, it looks like it might swivel on its base so as to act as a giant laser reflector. Lots of Touch Up London potential here.

    • http://undefined DeanN

      I’m torn on it, really. It could look amazing, but then against a stark grey winter London sky, it might look like the most terrifying behemoth imaginable.

  • http://undefined sinisterpictures

    Actually, after reading M@ mention about the way it looks as if it could swivel, it reminded me of a rotating cube storage device for audio cassettes I once owned too.

  • http://undefined Amanda Farah

    Why do I seriously doubt this is going to be as friendly towards they public as they claim?

  • http://undefined jamesu

    It’s better than it could have been – it’s never going to be that great, the demands of the brief are very tricky.

    It does look like the rotating cube cassette holders.

    Republicans are fliping out about it being a) expencive and b) in a gay area – ammusing because it was the Bush administration that launched the scheme and picked the site…

  • http://undefined sinisterpictures

    b) in a gay area, That made me laugh! I have visions of some secret CIA satellite with a new high tech land sexuality detection camera on board.

  • zefrog

    Gay area? what gay area?! it’s about as close of Vauxhall as the current one is of Soho!

  • http://undefined DeanN

    For comparison’s sake, here are the other shortlisted designs.

    If the US right-wingers aren’t impressed by the winner, Lord knows what they would’ve made of the Morphosis effort.

  • Over the River

    The new American Embassy to the buildings around it. “Well you started it.”

  • http://undefined Kingpin

    Funny, often it seems that anything “modern” is gobbled up and adored by those who profess to be architecture fans/experts, many who in fact aren’t, for the very reason that it is “modern”.

    Yet, here this is, being decried as boring… and me, often not a fan of modern architecture, is left liking it.

    Strange how these things work out.

    We still have a couple of those rotating cassette dispensers in our kitchen.

  • M@

    When you see the high-res pics of the ‘scrim’, or the architectural model there’s no way you could call it boring. I can imagine how people might dislike it, but it’s surely not dull.

  • NewHCE

    Geez, didn’t the architect see Bourne Ultimatum? Don’t they see how easy it will be for a spy to use a telescope from across the street to read the combination of the safes these guys keep in their offices?

    In all seriousness, is there anything about the color of the glass? My guess is its going to be mirrored, which sucks.

  • OctaviusIII

    Pardon my scraping the bottom (that week around the ists thing led me here), but at least it’s better than the atrocious American Embassy in Ottawa. That one was supposed to resemble a ship but instead looks like a corporate neo-fascist fortress, with a black lookout tower peering at the whole of the city around it, snipers no doubt ready to fire on anyone that dares to challenge its supremacy.

    It’s a shame, though, because it’s absolutely lovely inside and is right on the edge of one of the nicer neighborhoods in the city. Good luck, London!