TfL Confirm More Details About New Routemaster Bus

2312_newbusforlondon.jpg
Bus design by Foster & Partners and Aston Martin, one of the joint winners

Transport for London today confirmed that the 21st-century Routemaster will be built by Wrightbus of Northern Ireland, and will be introduced to the streets of London by 2011, with a full complement of the vehicles inheriting most of the bendy bus routes in time for the Olympics.

No new images have been released, though the Guardian got a transport expert to knock together an idea of how it might look. Key among the details released by TfL: it’ll have 40% better fuel consumption than current diesel models, and carry at least 87 people. As for the design: it’ll have two staircases, one front and one back, which should help with flow of passengers onto and off of the vehicle; two conventional doors, one of them wheelchair-enabled; and a third entrance via an open rear platform, which will “have the facility to be closed off at certain times, such as at night”.

Say what? A defining characteristic of the Routemaster is the rear platform, and Boris himself spoke during the election about the tyranny of the bendy bus with its driver-operated doors. What would closing off the door at night, and other times, achieve? One answer is that the rear platform would only be operational when a conductor is present. Yet the issue of conducters remains a mysterious one: Boris promised them during his campaign, then announced that the job could be done by PCSOs, but concerns from police and the estimated additional cost may have stymied that proposal.

Speaking of costs: the actual figure is much debated — TfL said in the summer it would cost £12 million to replace the bendy buses, others have estimated the cost at £60 million — but as the articulated eyesores are set to perish before the new bus even rolls off the production line, does that figure include the hefty tub of cash spent on new buses to temporarily replace the bendies? London Reconnections notes that the first batch of replacement buses, operating on the 38 route, are also built by Wrightbus. Curiously, these buses are operated by Wright Gemini 2 models which also have a capacity of 87. Are we getting a cut-and-shut job with the Gemini 2 and some extra stairs tacked on the back?

One thing the bus sorely needs is a decent name. The project’s boring official title is the New Bus for London, or NB4L, though in a city that loves to re-name icons on the fly, that’ll never wash. Any suggestions?

  • http://undefined BorisWatch

    “with a full complement of the vehicles inheriting most of the bendy bus routes in time for the Olympics.”

    You *sure*? That would mean building about 500 of them in a period of about 8 months, mostly replacing nearly brand new diesel buses and before the design has been properly shaken down. If you want to run through the Olympics with that sort of plan, you have balls of steel.

    Other things: there’s not even a sketch, it’s been released quietly on a slow news day, there’s no costing (other than TfL treating it as a £50m+ project for cost control purposes), no trustworthy timetable (‘never trust a product schedule based on the seasons’ is a good maxim), no indication of which routes it’ll be used on, no indication of what status the ‘conductor’ will have, since the routes are pay-before-boarding at present, no indication of what premium the bus operators will put on the tenders for using the bus (other than that we know they’re unhappy at the idea).

    It’s a mess. Conveniently one we can’t ask questions about, since they’re all on holiday now.

  • http://undefined DeanN

    “That would mean building about 500 of them in a period of about 8 months, mostly replacing nearly brand new diesel buses and before the design has been properly shaken down.”

    That’s the challenge they’ve set themselves. I agree it is a preposterously difficult target.

    You’re right that there are a lot of unanswered questions, though it’s a little cynical to cite the timing of the release as being motivated by the Christmas break

  • http://undefined M@

    Concerning the name: I believe I already had the last word on this.

    http://londonist.com/2008/12/alien_versus_routemaster.php

  • http://www.hudexperten.blogspot.com qwickpk

    I like the design of the bus.

  • http://undefined Christopher Scollo

    Name suggestion: The Routemistress

  • http://undefined BorisWatch

    “it’s a little cynical to cite the timing of the release as being motivated by the Christmas break”

    They’ve done it before though, in the sense of burying bad news, such as fare increases and investment cuts being buried in PR about agreeing business plans, and the timing means that anyone trying to elucidate further details will be met with holiday silence.

    In this case, however, the timing plus the lack of detail in the press releaes makes me wonder what they’re actually burying – is the appearance perhaps not particularly Routemastery (apparently the front end looks a bit similar, according to the man from Wrightbus), or is there some cost issue that would be unwelcome just as the fares go up and bus services start being cut.

    On the appearance thing, I note nearly everyone thinks it’s going to look like the competition winners. There’s no evidence for this whatsoever.

  • Lindsey

    Simple yet superb!

  • http://undefined Jack Self

    Bond’s Breadbin?