Farewell, Bendy; We Hardly Knew Ye

2909_bendybus.jpg

One of Boris Johnson’s manifesto pledges was to remove bendy buses from the streets of London and replace them with a next-generation Routemaster – a populist promise that played well in London’s hinterlands, where the moneyed folk rarely ride public transportation.

While the second half of that pledge is hostage to the whims and ideas of folk who entered the design competition, the first half looks to be on track: a consultation is currently underway discussing whether to remove the articulated vehicles from three routes, with the 38 bus likely to become a double-decker, and the 521 and the 507 replaced by 12-metre single deckers.

The 38, which runs between Hackney and Victoria, was one of the last routes to go bendy, where it replaced a fondly loved Routemaster in a less-than celebrated debut in October 2005. Since then the new vehicles have been cheerfully fouling up the traffic at Piccadilly Circus, getting stuck on Rosebery Avenue, or sailing along Essex Road either packed solid or near empty (maybe it’s us, but a semi-full bendy is as rare as a baby pigeon)

Critics of the proposed move point out that the route’s exceptionally high frequency (only the 25 and 73 are used more) is aided by the bendy’s three doors and higher passenger capacity. According to one slightly hysterical London Assembly member, the move would bring “misery” to passengers, with reduced hourly capacity and more carbon emissions as more buses are pressed into service. Such misery, of course, being in opposition to the enjoyable Friday-night free for all as riders pile onto the bus in droves and ones face is delicately douched in the sweat glands of a fellow passenger’s armpit.

The consultation continues until October 3rd, while local folk can pitch their oar in via this online survey.

Image from steve_w’s Flickrstream via the Londonist pool

  • alexmuller

    I could never understand what everyone had against bendy buses… sure, they broke a few times, but what’s with all the whining?

    That said, as someone who gets the bus the whole time, I’m looking forward to a modern routemaster.

  • Amanda Farah

    I hope they change the 29. It stops at the end of my street and a couple of times a month the transit police swarm it and block up the pavement.

  • Kingpin

    Good riddance!

  • jamesu

    Bendy buses are very good at some things, very bad at others.

    What they are good at is getting lots of people on them quickly and taking them somewhere in a roughly straight line.

    If you used the memory I have most strongly of current Bendy routes in their double deck form is buses flying past ‘full’ as the driver decides not to let anyone else on.

    I’d rather get on a crush loaded bus than be left at the side of the road.

    This bendy absolutism in either regard strikes me are more an emotional reaction than a rational one.

    Let us have bendys, double deckers, single deckers, routemasters! – let us have liberty!

  • rmcmorran

    The one thing that makes bendy buses dangerous is the maniacs that drive them. Why they think it’s appropriate to round a bend at 50mph is beyond me. Their favourite tricks are sitting across junctions and pedestrian crossings, overtaking cyclists with inches to spare and hemming cars in. If TFL could hire bus drivers who aren’t frustrated racer boys with supressed anger issues, then the bendy bus would work fine.

  • markle

    I’m not quite sure how any transition will benefit passengers – London Travel Watch have just announced that replacing bendies on these three routes will mean that operators will incur an extra £12.6m in operating costs per year (they’ll have to run more buses on each route to maintain capacity, which = more drivers, and more vehicles to finance and maintain). If you extend this to all of the bendy routes, you get an extra £60m in operating costs per year.

    Someone’s going to have to pay for this, and it will invariably end up being the passengers. But how do passengers really benefit from this? Less doors means more time spent at each stop for people to get on and off, which means longer journey times. £60m for a slower and less efficient bus service seems like a bit of a swindle.