What's Happening At Nine Elms?

Rachel Holdsworth
By Rachel Holdsworth Last edited 35 months ago
What's Happening At Nine Elms?

Skyscrapers planned for Vauxhall.

Nine Elms. It's a hulking great development, taking in the whole southern swathe of the riverside between Lambeth and Chelsea bridges. It'd take you 40 minutes to walk end to end — or at least, it will when the whole river path is opened up around Battersea Power Station. Around 35,000 people are expected to move into all the new homes that are being built, and around 25,000 permanent new jobs will be created. It's going to completely transform this part of London in a very short space of time, so we met with the team tasked with putting the whole project together to find out what's happening.

Let's start with the most controversial aspect: all those skyscrapers. 18,000 new homes are being built here, with around 3,500-4,000 affordable homes. It's an indisputable fact that London needs more housing. We either build out onto the green belt or we make the most of the brownfield we have and build up. Or probably both. Clusters of skyscrapers like the ones planned for Vauxhall aren't the most pleasing on the eye, or fun to walk around the bases of (wind tunnels); all these glass towers create a perverse blandification of the skyline that's comparable to Ian Nairn's fears about high streets all ending up looking the same.

We suspect that many of the aesthetic objections might go away if there was a sense that this housing was for everyone. Flats in the Riverlight development are currently up for sale with studio apartments starting from £550,000, which is just stupid, and we've written before about what's happening at Battersea Power Station. However, this is where the story of Nine Elms gets complicated. Very little public money has gone into this development, which is transforming a belt of light industrial land. Levies on private developers are paying for the infrastructure necessary to support the change from industrial to residential and commercial — new schools, drainage systems, a park and green spaces, refurbishment of New Covent Garden Market, new health facilities — and that money's coming from property sales.

The Riverlight development.

Helen Fisher, programme director for the Nine Elms Delivery Team, told us:

"We never had quite enough money — about £500m, £600m — but it was near enough, in terms of what we were expecting to receive from the developments. Part of that calculation about what sites could give in terms of infrastructure is also what we needed to deliver in terms of affordable housing. So you’ve got both of those things going on in any financial appraisal. What we do is coordinate the delivery of the infrastructure. That £500m/£600m pot will come in over 10 years so it’s not all cash in the bank, we need these guys to build so we can get the money."

As the property market has boomed these last few years, developers have been able to command higher prices for these top end flats, which has meant extra money becoming available on top of the levies already in place. It's like a tax on rich people. Wandsworth Council, for example, has gained an extra £40m from the Embassy Gardens development in a profit sharing deal. (The money will go towards building housing on council land elsewhere in Wandsworth, for the simple reason that more units can be built somewhere the council doesn't have to pay exorbitant land prices.) But there is affordable housing going into Nine Elms itself; on the Wandsworth side, priced at around 64% of average market rents across the borough — not an average of rent levels in Nine Elms, which will be massively higher.

Let's also address the issue of segregating the rich from the poor — the 'poor door' conundrum, if you will. In One Nine Elms, the market and affordable housing will be mixed in together, but in most cases the affordable housing will be in a separate building or a separate core (same building, different entrance). As much as we all hate this, it comes down to service charges and costs. Luxury towers tend to come with great big annual fees to pay for that 24 hour concierge, gym and restaurant. If you're an affordable housing tenant you're clearly not going to be able to pay that, and that's how we end up with stories like social housing tenants at One Tower Bridge being denied access to a garden, because they wouldn't be able to afford to pay for its upkeep. Housing associations, who actually run the affordable homes, prefer separate facilities so they can keep control of costs.

So what we're ending up with at Nine Elms is a variety of schemes. One's funding a block for frail elderly people. One development's paying for new social housing, charged at around 40-45% of borough-wide market rents. Developer Bellway, on the old Christie's warehouse site, is providing 76 affordable homes but also 114 homes specifically set aside for the private rental sector — a 'build to rent' scheme where the properties are managed by decent, large scale landlords, and something we like. So long as central government isn't funding genuinely affordable housebuilding on a massive scale we'll have to rely on this hotch-potch approach of cobbling together money from private development and — when you consider what else has been funded by the levies — Nine Elms has done the best it can.

Rendering of Nine Elms, seen from the Battersea end.

After the homes, the next big change is all the new commercial space that's being created — and the jobs that will bring. The 25,000 new jobs are permanent positions — i.e., not included in the construction roles that make up the majority of opportunities now — and will be in offices, shops, restaurants, leisure and the 11 new hotels planned for the area. Lambeth and Wandsworth councils have set up jobs brokering teams to connect local people with the latest openings.

Then there's the regeneration of New Covent Garden Market. Helen Evans, Director of Business Development and Support at the Covent Garden Market Authority, says:

"We’re basically a public body so everyone’s happy for us to do this so long as we don’t cost anybody any money. We have a deal with a private development partner, we will be giving up part of our land and in return we will get a shiny new market and the ability to do public facing things."

What she means is that, instead of being hidden behind a brick wall, the market will become more accessible to everyone. As well as the stalls in the morning — did you know that 75% of London's florists visit the market once a week, or that 40% of the fruit and veg we eat outside the home comes from here? — they plan to run masterclasses, tastings and school programmes. In the evenings, the market will be open for events like jam making.

The other major change is that routes towards the river will be opened up for the first time. Where the Thames has been, in effect, blocked off by industrial sites, the team were excited to show us the new north-south access points from Wandsworth Road and the north end of Battersea. "That’s the exciting bit," said Helen Evans. "It’s about making the links between things that already exist so it’s much more organic than central planning. There’s lots of hidden treasures, but there’s a railway line and roads that sometimes block off people from accessing those things."

They'll need more deckchairs if they're planning to show Back to the Future.

A new park, snaking along the length of the development, will provide a pedestrian and cycling route through the area. The first section — albeit very small — will open in 2016, and there are other pocket parks planned. Potential designs for a bridge between Nine Elms and Pimlico were released recently, though planning permission is still needed and Westminster Council is currently sceptical. As well as the Northern line extension, two new bus routes are coming with existing routes getting a capacity boost and, says Helen Foster, "improvements to Vauxhall station, tube and Network Rail and the other two train stations in the area. There’s a cycling strategy throughout the whole of the area as well as riverboat services. There’s a whole package of transport."

So where does this leave us? With a radically altered riverside, sure. But London's constantly changing and, as we said above, building up could well be inevitable if we're going to cope with a population increase that could see us hit 10 million by 2030. One positive thing going for Nine Elms is that it hasn't gone the Greenwich Peninsula route, of shunting the ordinary housing half a mile inland so the wealthy get their own little playground. In the absence of mass government investment in low cost housing, schemes have to rely on community infrastructure levies and Section 106 payments from private developers in order to make anything happen.

Do we wish the area would be more affordable? Yes. Do we recognise that with the current economic and political climate, that's simply not going to happen? Yes. In the middle of a housing crisis and where so many other schemes are reducing affordable housing provision citing costs, we're actually quite impressed with what Nine Elms is managing to achieve with housing and overhauling the entire area. It won't be to everyone's taste, but we're certainly interested to see how it pans out into reality.

Last Updated 13 March 2015

woggly

Good article Rachel. Just enough cynicism (well merited) without being scathing. I do love this 25,00 jobs bit though. I think you need to amend it to: 25,000 low paid jobs for people that have absolutely no hope of living in the same area

Unga Munga

This is a very nice plan that simply forgot one very important and crucial aspect of the area : no infrastructure, no transport facilities. All new building developing projects run in the last few years in the area are still largely empty. Battersea High Street is a desolation with no local commerce. The train stations in the area look like abandoned. Please enjoy the experience... A right article should be focus on these aspect also, this instead look like a pr release. This is not good journalism.

rationalplan

Um a tube extension and two new tube stations is actually quite considerable transport infrastructure.

Also how do you know they are all going to be low paid jobs? I doubt the office jobs will be all low paid.

Greg Tingey

Will a new US embassy be built (eventually) or not?

Duck

Terribly uninformed article showing lack of ability for critical thinking,

Nicolas Chinardet

I'm rather sceptical of the validity of the arguments we fed in support of "poor doors". I'm sure it would be quite easy to calculate different charges for the "affordable" parts of a development. They can do it for rents/value after all...

or have no charges at all: ie, that garden in Tower Bridge could be paid for by the "rich" tenants (indeed it will be) and access be given to all in a spirit of good neighbourliness...

Interestingly, my building has one door for all but has a "poor lift" (it only services the "affordable" floors). Otherwise everyone has access to the same
services (including concierge) and pays the same rates for service charges.

(also I don't see why tenant should have to pay charges for the presence of a restaurant in their building as mentioned in the article)

francesco

Very good article, well researched and presented.

Simon

We do not want the cityscape of London, ruined with ugly skyscrapers, particularly the Vauxhall project. Let them be contained in the City of London alone. This is London not New York, it completely ruins the character of the Thames waterside. For those that say there is a housing shortage in London there are plenty of empty properties that could be reclaimed and refurbished. How as well 4,000 "Affordable" just under a quarter proposed, new homes out of 18,000 going to help that leaves 14,000 going to Private buyers.

Mark

I've lived in Vauxhall for 8 years - and to be honest I welcome the development. Much of the area between Vauxhall and Battersea previously consisted of desolate industrial warehouses, and the developments will be a significant improvement to the neighborhood. Through S106 agreements there have been massive improvements to local parks and community facilities - and we have more shops than we used to.

Are the developments ideal? Nope. Do they provide as much social housing as I'd like? Nope. But they are a vast improvement on what was there before, and will create a far more cohesive and pleasant place to live than the oft-compared Dubai Marina.