World Pride 2012 In Trouble

They rained on our parade

Five years ago, London was awarded the right to host World Pride in 2012. It sounded like a good idea at the time. With the Olympics and the Diamond Jubilee, this would be another great opportunity to showcase London on the world stage and a fitting way to mark the 40th anniversary of the first Pride march in London.

Early last week, however, rumours started to surface that the organisers were running into financial difficulties. Reports have been confusing and contradictory but it seems that a tab of about £65,000 for security and health and safety had been left unpaid from last year and Pride would not be allowed to go ahead until that and this year’s costs were met.

Organisers quickly denied this before just as quickly releasing a statement saying that due to financial problems the planned global extravaganza would have to be drastically scaled down; from something that looked already remarkably similar to previous Pride events in the capital.

First, the Parade, the very heart of the celebration, will not feature the traditional floats and will become a “procession”. It will also start two hours earlier than planned, thus scuppering many a long-made travel plan.

As a result of the new categorisation, the members of the Gay Police Association will reportedly not be able to march in uniform. This may also apply to members of the services.

The rally in Trafalgar Square will now have to finish at 6pm and the events in Golden Square and Soho Square have been cancelled altogether. The family event in St Anne’s Garden is still happening. The International conference on LGBT human rights in the Commonwealth was also unaffected.

Finally, drinking licences in Soho will not be extended and outdoor drinking not allowed. This sounds like a recipe for disaster as there is simply not enough space in the bars to accommodate everyone. How this will be enforced is beyond us.

Blaming it on a tough economic climate, the spin put on this by the organisers is one of safety and a return “to the roots of the original Pride London rallies” but many have seen this fiasco as an embarrassment for the LGBT community and for London itself.

Amid calls for Boris Johnson and Elton John (a patron) to save Pride, several meetings have taken place at City Hall during the past week only to have the event declared “beyond salvaging“. This came with the confirmation that Mayor Johnson will not be attending the parade (he hasn’t since his first in 2008), an apology (for “confusion and chaos”) from the organisers, and finally the announcement of the resignation of the Chair of Pride London.

During the week the sorry story had slipped further into farce when organisations who had spend so much time and money (a float costs £2,500 before it is even decorated) were allegedly told that they could use shopping trolleys to replace their float.

Yesterday we learnt that campaigner Peter Tatchell, who’s taken part in most of those 40 London Prides, may have been banned from speaking at the rally by City Hall because of his links to the Green party.

This is not the first time that the event has run into financial problems. Most notably, in 1999, Europride was cancelled altogether after it went bankrupt. In recent years, accusations of being too commercial and not focused enough on the community have been as regular as the gathering itself. There is, after all, no way to please everyone.

Groups are already forming for the organisation of the 2013 edition and we may just end up with several events, next year!

World Pride 2012 is taking place in the West End on Saturday 7 July. People wanting to take part in the “procession” are asked to assemble from 10am at Portman Square for an 11am start. Photo by zefrog.

  • Ravingtory

    On a positive note, a procession takes us back to the early days of Pride as a protest. Maybe this will help focus on what Pride should be about – a protest, not commercialism.

  • truthmonkey

    We are unlikely to end up with several events in Westminster in 2013.

    I and other former trustees were involved in advising a “rescue” plan for Soho that involved the Soho Business Forum taking responsibility for the street closure there.  This failed as Westminster do not permit large scale events taking place in nearby areas to be run by different organizations as they believe this hampers communication and makes crowd flow etc unsafe. 

    That’s not to say differently run events couldn’t take place in other boroughs – such as Camden, Lambeth or Southwark – or on different days.

    Personally my preference is for a community-led parade on Friday evening with a political rally (run like 17-24-30 with just a small stage) somewhere; a street party in Soho on Saturday led by the Soho Business Association, and; a park-based music festival on the Sunday run by a commercial organization such as Mama Group (who own G-A-Y and Mean Fiddler and run events such as Lovebox).

  • http://twitter.com/zefrog Nicolas Chinardet

    And Now Peter Tatchell is basically accusing City Hall of sabotaging Pride:

    London Mayor accused over World Pride fiasco

     

    Westminster threatens gay venues in Soho

     

    Boris Johnson snubs Pride, declines to attend

     

    Offers of funding rejected by City Hall

     

    Hire of Trafalgar Square hiked by 100%

     

    Change in start time is recipe for chaos & disruption

     

    Many Jewish, disabled & older people excluded

     

    Bid to stop Peter Tatchell speaking at rally

     

    London – 5 July 2012

     

     

    “The World Pride organisers have made mistakes and must share some of
    the blame for the current shambles. However, they are not the sole
    villains. The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, could have rescued Pride
    but has apparently chosen to not do so. The actions and inactions of the
    Greater London Authority (GLA) have compounded the problems that Pride
    now faces,” said human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, who helped
    organise Britain’s first Gay Pride parade, held in London 40 years ago,
    in July 1972. He has attended every Pride since and is currently the
    Director of the Peter Tatchell Foundation.

     

    This month is the 40th anniversary of the first Pride parade and veterans from 1972 will lead Saturday’s London march.

     

    “A lack of official transparency and apparent economy with the truth at
    City Hall is part of the problem. Another issue is the Mayor’s
    unwillingness to consult with the wider lesbian, gay bisexual and
    transgender (LGBT) community to find a solution,” added Mr Tatchell.

     

    “City Hall has known about the problems for many weeks. Like Pride, the
    mayoral team failed to involve other LGBT stakeholders and financiers to
    raise extra cash and to draft a credible rescue plan. If the Mayor had
    acted weeks ago, we would not be in this mess.

     

    “I have received information from insiders at City Hall. There is
    concern about the behaviour of some officials connected to the Mayor and
    perhaps the Mayor himself.

     

    “Among other things, it is alleged as follows:

     

    “Gaydar and Smirnoff last week reportedly offered well in excess of
    £60,000 to cover Pride’s funding shortfall but the Mayor’s office
    spurned this offer claiming it was “too late”. This “too late” claim is
    disputed, with some people suggesting that there was still sufficient
    time last week to produce a viable rescue package, if the Mayor’s team
    had the will to do so.

     

    “Last year, the hire of Trafalgar Square for the post-parade rally
    reportedly cost in the region of £50,000. This year the GLA has
    allegedly demanded £100,000. If true, this is a wholly unjustified 100%
    increase which has, in part, created the funding shortfall. The GLA
    appears to be imposing on Pride and the LGBT community charges that many
    people find extortionate and exploitative. It seems to be more about
    making money than serving Londoners.

     

    “It is claimed that the GLA is forcing Pride to use certain contractors,
    who are not necessarily the cheapest. This may be artificially
    exacerbating Pride’s money problems.

     

    “The financial difficulties faced by Pride are mostly a cash-flow
    problem. The GLA has forced Pride to pay for everything upfront as a
    condition for the events to go head. Pride says the sponsorship money it
    expects to receive by the end of the festivities would have bridged
    most of the funding gap.

     

    “The GLA has reportedly not paid all the money it promised to Pride; thereby compounding the cash-flow difficulties.

     

    “The Mayor’s office says there are “problems” and “safety issues”
    related to the Pride parade which require the start time to be bought
    forward to 11am and which require huge insurance premiums to be paid.
    However, they refuse to say what these problems and safety issues are.
    This is tantamount to demonising Pride as a troublesome event. In
    contrast, the police say it is one of the most trouble-free events held
    in London. Previously the police have adopted a very low presence,
    confident that Pride has no problem or safety issues. 

     

    “Mayor Johnson’s sudden change in the parade start-time from 1pm to 11am
    is very unfair to people who have pre-booked trains and coaches for
    a1pm start. The march will have left before many people have arrived.
    This is a recipe for chaos and disruption. Instead of an orderly march,
    tens of thousands of disorganised people will swarm through the streets
    towards Trafalgar Square and Soho, blocking traffic and causing
    grid-lock. 

     

    “The 11am kick-off clashes with Jewish Sabbath services, which means
    that many Jewish people will be unable to attend. The lack of religious
    and cultural sensitivity by the mayoral team is surprising and shocking.
     

     

    “The Metropolitan Police are to be commended for their sympathetic,
    supportive relations with the Pride organisers. In contrast to City Hall
    and Westminster council, the police have gone out of their way to
    facilitate the Pride events, as much as possible given other official
    obstructions.

     

    “The Mayor’s team has, in effect, gagged the Pride organisers by
    requiring them to submit all news releases to City Hall for approval.
    Changes in wording have been demanded by City Hall, which some say suit
    the spin the Mayor’s office wants to put on the Pride fiasco. The Pride
    committee is not free to communicate with the LGBT community. It is
    alleged that Pride’s contract with City Hall gives mayoral bosses a veto
    over what the Pride committee can and cannot say publicly.

     

    “Not only have the city authorities forced Pride to cancel all official
    street parties in Soho, they also want to stop any unofficial parties.
    Well over 100,000 people are expected to pour into Soho after the parade
    and rally. Westminster council has sent what reads like a threatening
    letter to gay venues warning them that their licences could be revoked
    if they play music that is “audible outside of your premises” and if
    they allow customers to drink in the street. Ignoring the exceptional
    circumstances on Saturday, venues are expected to operate on Saturday
    “as on any normal day.” All celebrations must take place “within
    licensed premises,” the letter says. Westminster council has not
    explained how up to 250,000 people are expected to cram into 20 Soho gay
    venues with a maximum capacity of 5,000 people.

     

    “No plans have been made by the Mayor or Westminster council to deal
    with the vast numbers of people expected on Saturday; apart from turning
    people away and dispersing them, which could lead to angry crowds and
    potential public order problems. This lack of contingency planning also
    risks creating traffic snarl-ups throughout central London, as crowds
    spill out into the streets with nowhere to go.

     

    “Cynics suggest that City Hall is not unhappy with all the bad publicity
    around Pride, in the hope that it will deter people from coming and
    keep the numbers low; making the festivities more manageable and easier
    to control.

     

    “Even though London is this year hosting World Pride, with LGBT
    delegations from around the world, the Mayor is not attending. Many LGBT
    people are interpreting his non-attendance as a snub. He did not attend
    last year either.

     

    “The Mayor’s office demanded that Pride drop me as a keynote speaker at
    the post-parade rally in Trafalgar Square, giving the organisers the
    impression that if I spoke City Hall’s authorisation for the entire
    rally could be withdrawn. Pride caved in to this pressure and informed
    me that I was being dropped from the speaker’s list. When this was
    exposed at Mayor’s Question Time on Wednesday, the Mayor agreed that I
    could speak, providing there were other political party speakers. He
    falsely claimed that I am a “Green politician”. I am not a politician. I
    am not elected, or standing for election, to any public office. I’m a
    non-party-political human rights campaigner. I was planning to speak
    exclusively on LGBT issues, with no mention of the Green Party. The
    political affiliations of other rally speakers have not been questioned
    or used against them. I was singled out.

     

    Watch Mayor’s Question Time here: http://goo.gl/ufwf3

     

    “Because of this news release, I expect the Mayor’s office may find some
    new excuse to bar me from speaking on Saturday. City Hall has form. In
    previous years, I have been banned by Boris aides from attending mayoral
    LGBT receptions.

     

    “The decision to axe floats, buses and cars in the parade is disastrous
    for older and disabled LGBT people. Many will not now be able to
    participate. This is against the spirit of legislation intended to
    protect disabled and older people against exclusion and discrimination.

     

    “Banning floats in the parade is also a big blow to the many LGBT
    charities that have spent thousands of pounds on hiring and decorating
    them. They will lose a major opportunity to raise their profile,
    publicise their work and secure donation pledges.

     

    “Corporate bosses are already discussing a take-over of Pride. They are
    not displeased with the current failings. They see Pride as a commodity
    and a financial opportunity. They want to turn Pride into a largely
    depoliticised commercial event. The GLA is understood to be sympathetic.
    This would diminish the LGBT community links and betray the ideals and
    values of Pride.

     

    “It is difficult to say which of these problems have been compounded by
    the Mayor and which ones are the result of over-zealous officials.

     

    “Although I believe these allegations to be true, based on information I
    have received, they are, at this stage, allegations not proven facts.
    Nevertheless, they have more than a whiff of credibility and they demand
    open disclosure and honest answers from Mayor Johnson.

     

    “Regardless of the current shambles, the parade will go head. Without
    the floats and parties, it will revert to its roots – a protest march
    for LGBT human rights. The Pride slogan is: “Decriminalise homosexuality
    worldwide – Global equality for LGBT people.” This is entirely
    appropriate, as July is the 40th anniversary of the UK’s first-ever Gay
    Pride parade, which took place in London on 1 July 1972.

     

    “The Mayor has a duty to help save Pride. If the event flops it will be a
    huge embarrassment to London, just three weeks before the Olympics.

     

    “I urge the mayor, police and Westminster council to re-open
    negotiations with the Pride organisers and other LGBT stakeholders to
    reinstate the start time of 1pm and to allow a small number of vehicles
    for older and disabled people.

     

    “For the sake of the many thousands of people expected to participate,
    and to avoid widespread disruption across central London, the city
    authorities have a public duty to make changes to ensure a happy,
    successful Pride,” said Mr Tatchell.