Theatre Review: The Wizard of Oz @ London Palladium

Andrew Lloyd Webber’s production of The Wizard of Oz, directed by Jeremy Sams, delivers everything one might expect from such a show, and perhaps just a little bit more.

It reveals a high level of slickness and a remarkable attention to detail. Courtesy of John Driscoll’s projection designs the audience feel as if they are tumbling through the hurricane with Dorothy, while Robert Jones’s Art Deco Emerald City is a wonder to behold. In contrast, other sets have a pleasing simplicity with much of Act One working around a circular Yellow Brick Road, the other props rising within and about it.

Compared with the film, more is made of the fact that Dorothy is an orphan, and that the inhabitants of the Emerald City are ostentatious, callous and negligent. Conversely, the newly introduced joke that the Scarecrow keeps forgetting he wants a brain is wearing, while some of the most popular numbers are reprised just a little too often.

None of the new songs written by Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice quite live up to Harold Arlen and E Y Harburg’s originals, but Professor Marvel’s Wonders of the World is entertaining enough. Similarly, Hannah Waddingham, by virtue of the strongest performance of the evening, transforms the Wicked Witch of the West’s Red Shoes Blues into something of a hit.

Danielle Hope, the winner of Over the Rainbow, is a commendable Dorothy. Her stage presence works well with the fantasy setting of Oz, which demands highly charged mannerisms and gestures. Emily Tierney is delightful as the glitzy, ditzy Glinda, quite different from the Good Witch of the North in the film, while Michael Crawford is a pleasing Wizard. Unfortunately, however, Paul Keating, Edward Baker-Duly and David Ganly are only passable as the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion, and the three successive scenes in which they meet Dorothy fall rather flat.

But this Wizard of Oz remains a thoroughly enjoyable show. How much one warms to it may depend on how much they are already in love with the film, but, if only on a superficial level, it should move the vast majority of fans.

Booking until 17 September 2011. Tickets: 0844 412 2957 or from the Wizard of Oz website.

Photo: The Scarecrow (Paul Keating), Lion (David Ganly), Tin Man (Edward Baker-Duly), Dorothy (Danielle Hope) and Wizard of Oz (Michael Crawford), (c) Keith Pattison.

  • http://www.karinski.net Talia

    I’d be furious had I paid for a ticket. I thought the first 20 minutes of act two was brilliant, as were the costumes and the magnificent stage design. However the rest fell sadly short as there was little energy, zest or suitable wonder created. Plus I could do without a camp bear like Lion and comedy Eastern European guards.

  • http://twitter.com/allanbard Ivan Stoikov

    No matter how many mishaps or bad songs the show has, we shouldn’t forget the good sides of such shows… Shows that make real classical stories come to life! That way more people could see and experience the eternal wisdom in those fantasy stories and realize fantasy and sci-fy are the most serious genres? And this show also promotes one of the stories that describe not just the too ordinary characters as wizards with sharp hats, vampires, fairies, princesses, kings, etc… Something all authors in the genre should do today, I strive for that too (weightless korks, Brown faces, fish-keepers, fiery men, rock pieces, one-eyeds, glowing living balls, etc…).

  • Shirley

    I was very disappointed with this production. It was poorly cast, lacking in energy and true spectacle.
    Munchkinland consists of umbrellas from under which the Munchkins appear. Imaginative and resourceful
    if put on in a church hall but, at The Palladium! Looks like it was all done on the cheap.
    Says it all when the dog gets the loudest applause.

  • daisy

    i went to see it last nigh and what a fantastic show!. the effects and the costumes could not get any better!. A triumph for Andrew Lloyd Webber. also i have to admit the dog, was well trained and was very comical. well worth the money, fantastic casting and wonderful songs

    Amazing.

  • missymoo

    Just come back from a trip to watch this fantastic show, it was everything I expected and more. Visually it was colourful and interesting especially the storm.Dorothy was played well by Danielle Hope and the dog was brilliant.The witch was one of my favourite characters and I loved the way she flew on a wire above the audience. I’m not a theatre buff, but would reccommend this show to anyone that enjoys light hearted fun.

  • Wargcat

    Attention to detail??? I don’t think so.  Anyone knows Toto was a Cairn Terrier, not a Westie!

  • NS

    I don’t think it really matters that Toto wasn’t a Cairn Terrier….It wasn’t as though they replaced him with a doberman :)   I went to see the show last night and I thought it was superb.  The staging was great, the cast (in my opinion) were fantastic, especially the wicked witch and I thought Dorothy was excellent in her role, especially as she also had to give commands to Toto throughout the performance that weren’t obvious to the audience to ensure he did what he was meant to do during the show….as well as acting and singing etc.  Overall a great night out