Booksy

banksy.jpg

Opinions at Londonist are divided about “street artist” Banksy. Many contributors here have a very high opinion of the man and his work. This Londonista does not. However, considering the views of my colleagues and the fact that the publisher of this website is behind Streetsy.com, so we know what he likes, I’ll tread as delicately as possible.

Here’s the short version for everyone who thinks that Banksy is, without question, fab and cool and edgy and counter-cultural and sticking it to The Man: he’s publishing a book. Here is what the Guardian Newsblog has to say about it. Go and buy it and put it next to your Eboy poster and ironic U2 special edition iPod. You’ll probably be able to find it in the Tate Modern Bookshop and branches of Magma near you. It will probably cost about £18.99.

Go now. Now. Go on.

OK, for the rest of you: how very edgy, counter-cultural, political and cool. A coffee table book designed to make it onto every anti-globalist’s Christmas list published by Random House, a division of German company AG Bertelsman, the largest book publisher in the world. First Banksy invented the idea of wittily juxtaposing iconic images to make a powerful statement – except that idea has been around for decades and beyond its undoubted wit and technical merit there’s little special about Banksy’s stuff. Oh, its ubiquity, that’s special. Good positioning for the Banksy “brand” – should shift a few books. Of course, he doesn’t advertise.

Second, Banksy brought art to people who don’t go to galleries by, er, slipping his work into galleries. And of course, having exhibitions devoted to his work.

Thirdly, he brilliantly subverting the global corporate machine by allowing his art to be used in the game Counter Strike. Counter Strike, an anti-war game about settling your differences non-violently and understanding the socioeconomic and cultural roots of terrorism, is published by IGN Entertainment, a division of Fox Interactive, proprietor Rupert Murdoch. Peace out, man. That’ll show the pigs. Similarly, his art appeared on the cover of a Blur album, published by Parlophone, a division of EMI Group, the world’s largest music publisher. Fight the power!

And now he’s subverting the whole idea of cashing in, turning bourgeois notions of making a quick buck on their heads and smashing complacent middle-class attitudes to selling out by publishing a lovely glossy book. (£18.99ishprobably, from the posher branches of Borders and the gift shop at the White Cube.)

But let’s consider the words of the artist and political philosopher himself:

“The time of getting fame for your name on its own is over. Artwork that is only about wanting to be famous will never make you famous. Any fame is a by-product of making something that means something. You don’t go to a restaurant and order a meal because you want to have a shit.”

So he accidentally achieved notoriety as a mere side-effect of innocently plastering his work all over every wall in London. That’s OK then. Here we were thinking he was an obnoxious overhyped boring self publicist.

Of course, that’s just my opinion.

  • http://black-square-brig.blogspot.com Dean

    “First Banksy invented the idea of wittily juxtaposing iconic images to make a powerful statement – except that idea has been around for decades and beyond its undoubted wit and technical merit there’s little special about Banksy’s stuff. Oh, its ubiquity, that’s special”

    Okay, so where exactly has Banksy claimed that he invented his tecniques? His juxtapositions are the latest in a long line of faintly-subversive, bourgeois-disturbing artworks. Simply because his fans may wrongly assume that he is breaking new ground doesn’t mean that he believes it to be true.

    You’re right to acknowledge the wit and technical merit of his work – I don’t know if he intended for it to be any more profound than that.

    I’m not particularly a fan of his work, but the attitude of the writer seems to be that – because Banksy has dared to achieve a level of sub-celebrity that his works are “exposed” each week by lazy fashion-mag editors – he is automatically devoid of any merit whatsoever.

  • Ricky

    Interestingly enough, there’s a bloke selling photographs of Banksy’s artwork in frames down at Portobello road. I hear he’ll give you 8 for £20 if you ask him nicely.

  • http://www.spaces.msn.com/members/russellcole38/ Russell

    I would like to point out that even having something resembling a counter-culture should appreciated in this day and age. Try living in the States for a while and you will soon realize that you had it better than you had thought, when you juxtapose your own culture with the “Divided States of Embarrassment.”

    Tony Blair almost seems like an insightful politician when compared to his cowboy friend, who is too busy talking to ‘god,’ in order to even grasp the magnitude of the disaster that his ‘holy’ crusade has managed to gets us into. This is not the appropriate forum for me to rail, so I will just leave it at that, and plead for any European woman to offer her hand to me in marriage so I can get the hell out of here.

    Help!
    Russell

  • http://simon.incutio.com/ Simon Willison

    You make a couple of serious errors with regards to Counter-Strike. Firstly, Banksy himself has nothing to do with his art appearing in the game. CS allows regulay players to create their own “decals” (spray paint templates) to use in game – obviously someone who likes his work made some decals (without his permission or even his knowledge) for their own amusement.

    Secondly, CS is published by Valve, who have no direct affiliation to Fox. IGN just run the CS website, http://www.counter-strike.net .

  • A girl

    Thanks, Russell, for slagging the US instead of actually addressing the issue of whether Banksy is bollocks or not. EVERYTHING can be blamed on the Bush empire, and that makes everything in the UK seem just fine. Now put down the Daily Mirror and gt out of the pub, you’ve been there too long.

  • http://www.spaces.msn.com/members/russellcole38/ Russell

    Thanks for the Warm Reply,
    This will be my last post, because I have trouble translating the contents of your response into English. I will simply say that culture of consumption absorbs everything, and to use associations that someone has in order to discredit his or her work seems unfair. In fact, I have Green Party US t-shirts that I am trying to get rid of if anyone is interested.

    Regards,
    Russell

  • http://www.pentangle.net/ Michael Williams

    I meticulously transcribed an issue of TVGoHome for occasions just like this.

  • Andrew

    Rofl clearly the author has never played or researched “counter strike”.

    An “an anti-war game about settling your differences non-violently and understanding the socioeconomic and cultural roots of terrorism”. I sincerely hope thats sarcasm.

  • Tony

    Here we go again. Why is it that any time an artist tries to make a bit of money from what they do they get criticised for it?

    Why the **** shouldn’t Banksy make a living from his art? Whether you like what he does or not, it’s pretty obvious that many people do like it and are quite happy to buy his book.

    The longer people keep spouting the kind of rubbish written above the longer most artists are going to live in poverty, or worse, have to go and do crappy jobs to survive.

    Grow up. And for christ’s sake research your articles properly before you write them.

  • trix

    banksy is a moder dad surrliest following the dad movement

  • damian asad

    you are an idiot who is not worthy of a witty reply.

  • http://www.totallymoney.com stevegibbs

    “First Banksy invented the idea of wittily juxtaposing iconic images to make a powerful statement – except that idea has been around for decades and beyond its undoubted wit and technical merit there’s little special about Banksy’s stuff. Oh, its ubiquity, that’s special”.

    That is a load of rubbish. Where did you get that idea.