It'd be too expensive, a logistical nightmare, environmentally dodgy and few people other than Boris Johnson really want it: the Thames Estuary airport idea has been killed off by the government's Airports Commission.
Sir Howard Davies has finally put Boris Island out of its misery, saying the concept hasn't been shortlisted as an option to provide London with new airport capacity. Just a few of the problems that were identified are a Liquid Natural Gas storage facility near the proposed site, concerns about birdstrike from the nearby wetlands, a cost to the taxpayer of £30bn-£60bn for the cheapest option, longer train journeys for passengers (an average of 19 minutes longer) and even the supposed benefit of 24 hour flying met with little enthusiasm.
Piling up all the various objections and problems, the Commission has decided the risks outweigh the advantages, saying:
"We are ambitious for the right solution... To roll the dice on a very risky project, where delays and overruns are highly likely, would be reckless."
Boris Johnson, however, refuses to take it lying down, calling the decision "myopic":
"Gatwick is not a long term solution and Howard Davies must explain to the people of London how he can possibly envisage that an expansion of Heathrow, which would create unbelievable levels of noise, blight and pollution, is a better idea than a new airport to the east of London that he himself admits is visionary, and which would create the jobs and growth this country needs to remain competitive. [The Estuary airport] remains the only credible solution, any process that fails to include it renders itself pretty much irrelevant, and I'm absolutely certain that it is the option that will eventually be chosen."
He's also threatening to continue lobbying for his pet project if he makes it back into Parliament — which, as we pointed out recently, given that an Estuary airport would mean the closure of Heathrow and that his chosen seat contains an awful lot of Heathrow employees, could make for an interesting campaign. Let it go, man. City Hall has already spent £3m from a £5m budget made up of council tax (i.e., our) money promoting this idea. Just let it go.