<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Londonist &#187; dispatches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://londonist.com/tags/dispatches/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://londonist.com</link>
	<description>A website about London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Setback For Brick Lane Arches</title>
		<link>http://londonist.com/2010/03/setback_for_brick_lane_arches.php</link>
		<comments>http://londonist.com/2010/03/setback_for_brick_lane_arches.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brick LANE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hijab arches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamic sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spitalfields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tower hamlets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonist.com/?p=16526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <img alt="2502_arches.jpg" src="http://d4k7s9ho8qact.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2502_arches.jpg?9d7bd4" width="105" height="120" class="image-right" /> </span>A <a href="http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/news/council_news/march/brick_lane_arches_planning_app.aspx">short notice</a> on Tower Hamlets council&#8217;s website reveals that, &#8220;due to the large amount of public interest&#8221;, the planning application for the <a href="http://londonist.com/2010/02/criticism_over_planned_sculpture_fo.php">Islamic-flavoured arches</a> at either end of Brick Lane has been temporarily withdrawn. The council, which was recently the subject of a Dispatches programme about Islamist encroachment in British politics, says it wishes to &#8220;build upon the extensive community engagement and consultation&#8221; (for which read: <a href="http://londonist.com/2010/02/brick_lane_sculpture_not_popular_wi.php">strident criticism</a> from locals). Their reflections could see the scheme amended, or if saner heads prevail, the idea could be scrapped and taxpayer money &#8212; which is actually earmarked for <a href="http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgsl/501-550/516_register_of_planning_decis/section_106_planning_obligatio.aspx">Section 106</a> obligations &#8212; be put to decent use for the entire community, not just those approved by a narrow-minded section of council apparatchiks.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <img alt="2502_arches.jpg" src="http://d4k7s9ho8qact.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2502_arches.jpg?9d7bd4" width="105" height="120" class="image-right" /> </span>A <a href="http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/news/council_news/march/brick_lane_arches_planning_app.aspx">short notice</a> on Tower Hamlets council&#8217;s website reveals that, &#8220;due to the large amount of public interest&#8221;, the planning application for the <a href="http://londonist.com/2010/02/criticism_over_planned_sculpture_fo.php">Islamic-flavoured arches</a> at either end of Brick Lane has been temporarily withdrawn. The council, which was recently the subject of a Dispatches programme about Islamist encroachment in British politics, says it wishes to &#8220;build upon the extensive community engagement and consultation&#8221; (for which read: <a href="http://londonist.com/2010/02/brick_lane_sculpture_not_popular_wi.php">strident criticism</a> from locals). Their reflections could see the scheme amended, or if saner heads prevail, the idea could be scrapped and taxpayer money &#8212; which is actually earmarked for <a href="http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgsl/501-550/516_register_of_planning_decis/section_106_planning_obligatio.aspx">Section 106</a> obligations &#8212; be put to decent use for the entire community, not just those approved by a narrow-minded section of council apparatchiks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://londonist.com/2010/03/setback_for_brick_lane_arches.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London Elects:  Debates, Whisky and More Scandal Next Week?</title>
		<link>http://londonist.com/2008/01/london_elects_d.php</link>
		<comments>http://londonist.com/2008/01/london_elects_d.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craigie_B</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boris johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Livingstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knife crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonist.com/?p=7755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="imgtop"><img class="centered" alt="130108cityhall.jpg" src="http://d4k7s9ho8qact.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/130108cityhall.jpg?9d7bd4" width="400" height="266" /></div>
<p>Ken Livingstone&#8217;s certainly had a tough few weeks.  For starters, Boris Johnson finally began to get his act together on a few fronts. He&#8217;s got a <a href="http://www.backboris.com ">new website</a>, <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23429409-details/Boris+signs+up+Tory+election+guru+to+boost+bid+for+Mayor/article.do">a new team</a>, and he&#8217;s had some success in generating noise around policy issues &#8211; most notably, knife crime.</p>
<p>Still, when push came to shove, Ken came out well on ITV&#8217;s first Mayoral debate, where &#8211; as expected &#8211; he clearly knew more than his opponents. (Watch it <a href="http://www.itvlocal.com/london/documentaries/?void=138708">here</a>.) His campaign staff were so confident of his performance they swiftly <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kvu-LJvPvs">Youtube&#8217;d his reaction to the debate</a>. His campaign is now recruiting volunteers <a href="http://www.kenlivingstone.com/page/content/splash/">on the internet</a> as well seeking donations. So things are beginning to look up, right?</p>
<p>Not quite &#8211; his main problem is that the grants scandal looks as though it isn&#8217;t, actually, over. The controversial Channel 4 &#8216;Dispatches&#8217; programme has been rooting around the Mayor, and its conclusions will be broadcast next Monday.</p>
<p>The Dispatches team is leaking like a broken sieve (driving up viewing figures for its programme, no doubt) so we already know, for example, that they have sent a <a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2239926,00.html">&#8220;series of incendiary claims&#8221;</a> to Ken for his response before it broadcasts next Monday, and that it focuses on the grants scandal. But <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3177667.ece">a juicy titbit fed to the Times</a> reveals that Dispatches has been testing Ken&#8217;s glasses at public events to see if they contain traces of alcohol.</p>
<p>If the tough few weeks gets worse over the next 3 months, then at least Ken can sleep assured of a nice <a href="http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=news.press.release.page&#038;obj_id=141636">£91,719 pay off</a> if the Conservatives have done their sums right.  Mind you, if they&#8217;re so incensed by this, shouldn&#8217;t they just campaign for his re-election?</p>
<p>Pic of the insides of City Hall from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/martinrp/246608912/">.Martin.&#8217;s Flickrstream</a></p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="imgtop"><img class="centered" alt="130108cityhall.jpg" src="http://d4k7s9ho8qact.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/130108cityhall.jpg?9d7bd4" width="400" height="266" /></div>
<p>Ken Livingstone&#8217;s certainly had a tough few weeks.  For starters, Boris Johnson finally began to get his act together on a few fronts. He&#8217;s got a <a href="http://www.backboris.com ">new website</a>, <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23429409-details/Boris+signs+up+Tory+election+guru+to+boost+bid+for+Mayor/article.do">a new team</a>, and he&#8217;s had some success in generating noise around policy issues &#8211; most notably, knife crime.</p>
<p>Still, when push came to shove, Ken came out well on ITV&#8217;s first Mayoral debate, where &#8211; as expected &#8211; he clearly knew more than his opponents. (Watch it <a href="http://www.itvlocal.com/london/documentaries/?void=138708">here</a>.) His campaign staff were so confident of his performance they swiftly <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kvu-LJvPvs">Youtube&#8217;d his reaction to the debate</a>. His campaign is now recruiting volunteers <a href="http://www.kenlivingstone.com/page/content/splash/">on the internet</a> as well seeking donations. So things are beginning to look up, right?</p>
<p>Not quite &#8211; his main problem is that the grants scandal looks as though it isn&#8217;t, actually, over. The controversial Channel 4 &#8216;Dispatches&#8217; programme has been rooting around the Mayor, and its conclusions will be broadcast next Monday.</p>
<p>The Dispatches team is leaking like a broken sieve (driving up viewing figures for its programme, no doubt) so we already know, for example, that they have sent a <a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2239926,00.html">&#8220;series of incendiary claims&#8221;</a> to Ken for his response before it broadcasts next Monday, and that it focuses on the grants scandal. But <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3177667.ece">a juicy titbit fed to the Times</a> reveals that Dispatches has been testing Ken&#8217;s glasses at public events to see if they contain traces of alcohol.</p>
<p>If the tough few weeks gets worse over the next 3 months, then at least Ken can sleep assured of a nice <a href="http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=news.press.release.page&#038;obj_id=141636">£91,719 pay off</a> if the Conservatives have done their sums right.  Mind you, if they&#8217;re so incensed by this, shouldn&#8217;t they just campaign for his re-election?</p>
<p>Pic of the insides of City Hall from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/martinrp/246608912/">.Martin.&#8217;s Flickrstream</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://londonist.com/2008/01/london_elects_d.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 386/405 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d4k7s9ho8qact.cloudfront.net

Served from: londonist.com @ 2012-05-26 22:18:45 -->
