Cable Car Will Be Called “Emirates Air Line”

The Mayor has just announced a sponsorship deal for the Thames-spanning cable car in east London: it will be branded as the Emirates Air Line.

The 10-year deal, as you might have gathered, is with Emirates, the airline that also lends its name to Arsenal’s stadium. The company has coughed up £36m for the rights, which is a little over half of the project’s estimated £60m*. Remember, of course, that Londoners were originally promised that no public money would go into the scheme. The shortfall is coming from our rail budget — an area which, as we saw this week, needs some serious investment.

Rather like Barclays with the cycle hire, Emirates have also been allowed to appropriate the roundel for the cable car’s logo. The announcement also included the news that the cable car route, and the Emirates / roundel logo, will also appear on the Tube map, with a ‘Emirates red’ streak linking the two stations. Additionally, the two stations will be named “Emirates Royal Docks” and “Emirates Greenwich Peninsula”. It’s not quite the first time that corporate branding will appear on the map (Ikea got there first) but it’s a huge move toward sponsorship all the same. And it might not be the end of corporate sponsorship on the Tube map: earlier this year TfL very nearly cut a deal to temporarily re-brand Oxford Circus after a wine company.

For Emirates, it looks like a steal: they’ll get their logo all over London for a relative pittance. Much like Barclays, in fact.

Here’s a video fly-through showing how it’ll work. It does look quite cool, although the video is a bit dry — we’d love those Taiwanese animators to have a crack at it.

So: what do we think about the “Emirates Air Line”, and will anybody actually use it?

*We originally stated, incorrectly, that the projected cost was £57m

  • Robin

    I wonder how well it’ll accommodate wheelchair users and people that move slowly, if it’s a constantly moving thing you have to get on fairly briskly.

    • http://twitter.com/opportunemoment Rosie Best

      The one at Alton Towers could be easily stopped for a bit by the station attendants to let people on. I guess the same will be possible here – at least it’d be a bit of a massive failure of design if it wasn’t.

      I have no intention to call it the Emirates Airline though, on the principle that it’s not an airline and doesn’t go to the Emirates. I still call them Boris Bikes, I expect Boris’ Cable Car will end up the same.

      • Jason

        Rosie, I think you’ve missed the point with the name. TfL has a naming convention of calling various parts of the network ‘Lines’.  Eg, District Line, Bakerloo Line etc.  Given that this is a cable car that travels through the air, I can see what they have called it an Air (space) Line.  

        The additional airline connotation looks quite clever and fortuitous?

        • http://historytoday.com Dean Nicholas

          It’s also possible the name was derived by Emirates themselves — they may have made the ‘Air Line’ thing part of their sponsorship pitch to TfL.

          • Jason

            I suspect you’re right Dean.  It was probably something like Cable Line and then Emirates or their ad agency saw the opportunity to build on the ‘Line’ connection…

      • Asafco

        Boris balls?

    • Alfredo

      I know, and this one guy who brought his bike, you gotta be quick

  • Graham

    I’m just glad it’s being built. It’s needed, it’s progress and I think it’ll be put to good use. Personally, I think the money Emirates and Barclays have paid is fair. They’re both great deals for the brands if the projects are hailed a success, but vs other sponsorship or advertising opportunities, they both come with much higher risk attached and don’t provide an instant return on investment.

    • Robin

      A river crossing down by Thamesmead is needed *more*, and that keeps being planned and put off for umpteen reasons. I’d far rather see the money for this go into that.

      This is a lovely looking project, but it looks more like a vanity project than a genuinely useful addition to public transport.

      • AK

        A new river crossing (tunnel/bridge) will cost far, far more and will need a lot more planning, consultation, bills passed, lobbying, etc. The money coming from the government towards this is tiny compared to the money required to build a proper river crossing so I don’t know how much difference that would have made.

  • Lil_ninja86

    I wonder if this will be seen as a transport link or a tourist attraction.

  • Toffer99

    I think Boris personally should cough up the balance of the cash -he’s probably got enough.
    If not they could sponsor him too so he could show up and say “Good morning, I’m Emirates Boris Pfeffel Johnson”.

  • Matthew

    I think it’s a great idea; although, will it be that relaxed in real life, or will you be forced to share cars with strangers, or have your party split into groups?

    - Robin, won’t they stop it for a short amount of time, as with the London Eye?

    • Robin

      “Robin, won’t they stop it for a short amount of time, as with the London Eye?”

      I suspect so, but it depends how it’s operated. I suppose I’m just dubious of the commitment to equal access for disabled people since the new Routemaster design was built, which is really poor – looks fine, from an access perspective, but several powerchair users have tested the one at the LTM and it’s awful.

    • ben

      Oh, god forbid you might have to share with strangers! dear oh dear.

  • Nick

    I think it’s great, and while the merits of the thing being anything other than a tourist attraction are dubious, I am sure it will get lots of use; a sort of Cockney (I know not really Cockney) London Eye. I do think, though, that £36million, considering all the extra branding perks Emirates are getting out of the deal, is cheap.

  • Slender Loris

    I would like to propose something more worthy of the name. This would be a hybrid cable-car/airship. It works as follows: a thermal or helium airship is tethered to cables anchored on both river shores. The cables run over pylons to keep them above shipping. The airship is pulled down to a landing on one side of the river. Passengers board. Cables on both sides are paid out till the airship attains cruising height (at which point the passengers enjoy fantastic views. Then the landing side cable continues to reel out while the destination cable pulls the airship across. Electricity cables placed to the tethering cables supply the airship with power for systems, lighting and climate, as well as for electric propulsion to maintain the ship’s heading against the winds. Once the other side’s landing is reached, the airship is pulled down and the passengers exit. Of course two ships could fly in opposite directions. 

    • Oscar

      The problem with that is the fact that it is so close to London City Airport, and it would also most likely be more expensive in the long run. However, its a very cool idea!

  • Anonymous

    basically Name may be  change from cable car into Emirate Airlines.
    http://board.emreaydin.org/index.php?action=profile;u=461875;sa=summary

  • Anonymous

    I think that this name of Place is same not a different .
     http://forum.glam0ur.com/member.php?838328-Beneena

  • Anon.

    Why do we have three (inc. Orbit and O2 skywalk) ways to view the East London skyline? But only one* major place to view West London where the skyline is actually worth looking at…

    Speaking of the 02, isn’t that also corporate branding on the map? The Standard claimed this was the first and you rightly mention Ikea, but “North Greenwich for the 02″ is unpaid corporate branding, maybe we should send them an invoice. I suppose you could also add to that list ExCel on some maps and Arsenal (even if they’ve now moved, that station was still renamed after them). Even Earls Court and Olympia get the benefit of having their organisation’s name on the map.

    Wish they’d be paying a bit more too, they’re getting a lot of branding through this. But why did they have to rename the stations totally? Why Greenwich Peninsular rather than North Greenwich and Royal Docks rather than Royal Victoria. If they are too far away to have the same name, then how can you claim its an interchange. I wish they’d keep the map simple.
    Not that this of course is significant compared to the fact our transport budget and increased fares are paying for this tourist trap.* = Yes there are places like the top of St. Pauls, but it isn’t exactly a high capacity accessible attraction where people are going for the view and most towers are closed, restricted or not that high when it comes to public viewing platforms.

    • Dean Nicholas

      All good points regarding the O2 / Arsenal / Olympia appearing on the map, but I think there are two key differences between them and the Emirates deal: firstly, the ones you mention all refer to major facilities in the vicinity of the station, and hence are (I think) intended to be of benefit to people travelling there; secondly, and more importantly, none of them are permitted to have their logo on the map. The Emirates logo will appear on every version of the Tube map for the next ten years, and after that presumably for another ten (unless the sponsor changes, in which case it’ll likely be their logo instead). 

    • Dean Nicholas

      Oh, and as for “only one major place to view West London where the skyline is actually worth looking at” — not exactly sure what you mean by west London, which doesn’t really have a skyline of any kind whatsoever, but the London Eye offers a pretty good view of the City and the West End.

  • Anonymous

    Any word on how much it’ll bloody cost to ride? I find the idea of spending £4 to skip the footbridge a bit much.

    • Anonymous

      what footbridge?

      • Anonymous

        Sorry, I meant tunnel.

  • Anonymous

    There’s not a tunnel here either, they are at Maritime Greenwich or Woolwich.

  • Cotale05

    Why can’t we have one that goes all along the Thames, as a completely new Transport system, or a mono-rail? Like on Thunderbirds!!! 

  • Alan

    What next? Lewis’s Oxford Street Underground? Westminster Station sponsored by Tesco? They should NOT have any sponsors on the tube map. Sell out…