After Hours Lock-In At The Foundry

foundry final.jpeg “Have you seen it? It’s an absolute eyesore,” the cockney Asian guy lounging on a sofa in a sunny Shoreditch street is saying. His jeans, as one of his mates delights in telling him, are ripped at the crotch (“Yeah, but I’m wearing cycle shorts underneath, so it’s alright”). “It looks like a massive baked bean tin,” he goes on. “Like a can of deodorant. It doesn’t fit with any of the architecture round here.”

He’s one of the handful of protestors outside the building that until recently housed the Foundry, the bar-cum-free-gallery that’s been the cornerstone of Shoreditch’s artistic and drinking communities for the better part of 10 years. The pavement around us is littered with more furniture and tents. Inside the building more squatters have barricaded themselves in, posting signs on the doors outlining their legal rights and warning that the building is always occupied. From the roof, where giant advertising hoardings once hung, there’s now a sign reading, “Resist! Occupy!”

The Foundry, it seems, is not going down without a fight.

In theory, the deal’s already done. The buildings’ owners have sold up to Park Plaza Hotels, who’ve been granted planning permission to demolish and replace it with an 18-storey cylindrical building (this is where the baked bean tin comes in), housing a retail complex and “Art’otel”. In a final insult, it’s rumoured that the bar in the new hotel will be named the Foundry, although it’s pretty unlikely you’ll still be able to get two drinks in plastic cups and change from a fiver.

But the inevitable march of progress hasn’t put off the protestors, who’ve been holed up there for over a week now. In that time, they’ve thrown free parties and shown free films, projecting documentary ‘Squat 69’ onto a sheet on the side of the building. The police made one rather half-hearted attempt to move them, but then seem to have decided it’s not worth the bother.

As anti-capitalist protestors go, this lot are proving surprisingly popular. This seems to be less to do with the squatters themselves (who look, the woman running a local pop-up gallery tell us, “like they’ve just been to Glastonbury and don’t want to go home”),than to do with the popularity of the Foundry. The bar was a Shoreditch institution for the better part of ten years, a cool and dirty kind of a place where artists got to display their work, bicycle couriers would hang out on a Friday night and everyone else got a chance to feel far hipper than they actually were. It sold its drinks for surprisingly reasonable prices, and offered beers brewed in East End breweries. And it was one of the few bars in London that everyone knew. As a result, this doesn’t just feel like another step towards gentrification. With the Foundry gone, and its owners admitting they may have to go as far afield as Tottenham to find a site for its replacement, the Shoreditch of Banksy and Nathan Barley has pretty much gone entirely.

This, we suspect, is why the local business owners quoted in press reports have been so blasé about an illegal occupation on their doorsteps. Few seem to think the end of the Foundry will be good for business. The public, too, seem to be largely on side, and a string of passers-by stop for a chat, including one respectable looking guy in work clothes, who screeches his bike to a halt and in a thick Middle Eastern accent demands to know, “Why they want to close the Foundry?”

What’s not clear is how the protest is going to end. There’s no end game planned, no reprieve expected. “The best case scenario,” says one skinny Aussie guy, “is that they reopen the bar. But that’s very unlikely. At least we can slow them down.”

“Eventually it will happen,” admits ripped jeans. “That’s just the way the machine works.” So what’s the point of the exercise? “To show people that they’re destroying the community, and that’s not the right way to go.” Holding things up, after all, will generate plenty of bad publicity – and, one assumes, cost the new owners cash. It may not stop things this time; but it could make developers think twice about future schemes that don’t have public backing.

How long they can hold out is an open question. Although someone is on site at all times, a lot of the occupants have their own squats to defend elsewhere, which rather limits the time they can spend at the Foundry. At the moment, with the weather warm and the protest still a novelty, it’s easy to keep enough people around to put the police off making a move. If it drags on for weeks, and the weather turns cold, that will get a lot harder.

At the moment, though, the police don’t seem quite sure how to handle things. Legally, there’s little question that the authorities have every right to evict the protestors. Practically, though, there are enough of them and they’re well enough barricaded, that it’s impossible to guarantee no one will get hurt. It doesn’t help that the Foundry is sited on a busy road junction: the only place you could park a police van is the expanse of pavement that’s currently buried in furniture. So far, the local police force don’t seem inclined to stick their neck out for the site’s developers.

So the protestors are quietly confident that they can hold out for a few more days yet. Last week the police did little but occasionally show up and loom. Reports that the cops had broken up an illegal party were just plain wrong, the protestors say. “They made an appearance, but they couldn’t do crap,” says the Aussie. “We broke it up when we wanted to go to bed.”

“It’s screwed up tight in there,” agrees another. “When they get round to trying something, I really want to be here to watch.”

  • http://undefined AdrienneCooper

    “It doesn’t fit with any of the architecture round here”

    If you turn around so that the Foundry is behind you and you’re facing towards Old Street tube, it’s very in-keeping with the vast majority of the architecture around here.

  • M@

    I’ve never really understood the ‘in keeping with other architecture’ line of reasoning. Eiffel Tower, Wembley Stadium, The Globe Theatre, the Great Pyramid, almost any church, almost every service station. None of them match their surrounding architecture. Where’s the problem? Surely variety is the spice of life.

  • http://undefined Jonn

    @Adrienne – so you’re saying the new building will fit right in if you don’t look at it…?

    I actually don’t feel that strongly about the design – partly because I have no sense of aesthetics, partly because the current building is not exactly a stunner. But I do think it’s a shame the Foundry itself has gone.

  • http://undefined AdrienneCooper

    I’m saying that the junction of Great Eastern and Old Street is basically the boundary between Shoreditch and the new developments – two minutes further west and you’re surrounded by office blocks and new residential developments. The idea that the design doesn’t fit the area is taking liberties with the geographical reality of the location.

    I think I should think that it’s a shame – the history of the building, rumoured involvement of one of the KLF etc etc. But it’s a crap and overcrowded bar (with nasty toilets) full of, arguably, rather crap art that you can’t look at even if you wanted to, because it’s in the middle of an overcrowded bar.

  • http://undefined Joel_B

    This article has fallen into the common trap of believing the “Protesters” rather than offering a balanced view. (What happened to last years Climate Camp Protesters…? Is that un-fashionable now…?)

    The only people who want the Foundry to exist are the “Protesters”. The former owners have cashed up and called it a day, and all the local residents (including me) fully support the new hotel. It’s telling that the only objections at the hearing in February were due to appearance, rather than utility.

    One of the things Shoreditch is about is trying new things. If everyone is so worried about “in keeping” why do we have skinny jeans, a-symmetrical hair-cuts and 40′s retro…? I can’t see a fashion for 70′s Brutalist Architecture…!

    The local businesses that miss the custom are Kebab Houses and Fried Chicken take-aways. Unlikely the bike couriers eat at the fancy restaurants around there..!

  • http://undefined local resident

    I agree with Joel (5 above).

    The londonist article is absurd and completely mispresents the situation. Here are the facts:

    1) A majority of local people (residents and businesses) want Foundry closed, the main reason being that there are far too many bars in Shoreditch now which have caused all sorts of problems.

    2) A majority of local people (residents and businesses)support Art’otel, as they feel it will bring older and more affluent visitors who will support the independent shops and boutiques in the area.

    3) The squatters may be nice people in themselves, but they do not seem to be genuinely homeless and they have therefore outstayed their welcome: they have caused considerable disturbance to local residents in terms of late-night noise: and it is local people who will foot the bill (through their taxes) which will probably run into thousands as the council arranges to evict them. The council and local police already have plenty of strain on their resources dedicated to the local community, without having to deal with this sort of thing in addition.

  • Jonn

    @6 Do you have stats to back you up? Not saying you’re wrong, I’d just be interested in seeing them.

  • http://undefined local resident

    Jonn (7)…this is correct, yes, though I would rather not go into stats on here. The proportions of local peoples’ views (for or against) were rather different from those who come from elsewhere.

  • http://undefined lutherblissett

    “Local resident” is Philip Kenyon, a self-confessed yuppie and Conservative activist who moved to the area seven years ago so he could walk to work in the city and enjoy a little refracted cool.

    He has been a one-man lobbying force in favour of the hotel. The “majority of local people” he claims to represent are curiously silent. In fact, it is just Philip, speaking with his customarily strident sense of entitlement.

    He is the cancer that is killing Shoreditch. Wouldn’t everyone be happier if, rather than so enthusiastically campaigning to destroy one of Shoreditch’s last artistic outposts, Philip did the honourable thing and moved out of the area himself? God knows he doesn’t belong here.

  • Jonn

    @8 Show me some stats and I’ll graciously admit that I’m wrong. But what you’ve said doesn’t fit with the conversations I’ve had.

    @9 That’s the funny thing about silent majorities, isn’t it? They’re rarely either silent or majorities.

  • http://undefined local resident

    9)…I’m not going to confirm or deny who I am on here – I am not a Conservative activist (!): nor am I a one-man band, as you can see from most of the comments on here, or as you would have seen if you had attended the public meeting re Art’otel which was packed, with about half the hall in favour (of the hotel) and half against. Once again it was obvious that many of the hotel’s opponents were not local people at all. That issue aside, I can assure you that a desire to reduce bars in the area pretty much unites everyone round here, regardless of their views on other issues. If you don’t believe me, ask any local councillor or better still, attend some local community meetings as I do (mostly on the estates, not in yuppie enclaves) and you will hear it for yourself. As for your other observations…I certainly don’t have any sense of entitlement, I have worked hard for what I have, and I also happen to take pride in the local community in which I live and to which I like to contribute where I can.
    Finally I respect others’ points of view, even though I may disagree with them, and I don’t descend into cariacature name-calling of the kind in your post.

  • http://undefined local resident

    10)…they weren’t silent at the planning meeting at the Town Hall in Feb!
    Anyway my previous post expands, so I won’t repeat myself.
    All the best.

  • http://undefined Joel_B

    lutherblissett : One person can not be a “Cancer” all by themselves. If all the Proposals were allowed to be built or developed in Shoreditch you would have 24/7 Bars and Clubs.
    Is that what you want…?

    Jonn : The Internet is more pitched to Vocal Minorities, often geographically dispersed. These people do not attend Planning Meetings or are interested in the local Community.

  • DeanN

    nor am I a one-man band, as you can see from most of the comments on here

    …yet a sizeable percentage of the comments are from you.

  • Jonn

    @13 I’ve not garnered these views from the internet, but from actual, physical people, with names and faces and everything. It’s fair comment that they don’t all live in Shoreditch, but as with any planning decision, the needs of locals and the needs of the wider community have to be balanced.

    But we’re dangerously close to going round in circles here. I say we all call each other Nazis and declare the debate done. Who’s with me?

  • http://undefined AdrienneCooper

    Nazi.

  • http://undefined lutherblissett

    Philip’s one-man war against the Foundry makes him the Raoul Moat of Shoreditch – delusional, isolated, and yet most certainly dangerous.

    You will see he at first claims that “A majority of local people (residents and businesses) want Foundry closed.”

    He later qualifies this to say that at the public meeting, “about half the hall in favour (of the hotel) and half against”, but claims those in opposition were outsiders who lacked the authority of his seven year’s residence.

    And yet, the truth is that “when the planning subcommittee consulted the neighbours, of 346 responses received, 289 wrote in objection to the plan. [And] CABE, English Heritage and the Victorian Society have all criticised the architects’ plans.”

    [quoted from http://www.purple-diary.com/post/773878986/save-the-foundry-we-are-occupying-this-area-to ]

    And so his false claim to represent community feeling is quickly demolished.

  • http://undefined lutherblissett

    Actually you can see Philip’s arguments when that article first appeared:

    http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23801868-commerce-is-chasing-art-out-of-hoxton.do

    And you will see the real feeling of Shoreditch locals as they attack Philip and his unwelcome views.

  • http://undefined Joel_B

    I think it’s great that such a well renowned footballer such as Luther Blissett has settled in Shoreditch. Good to see he’s taken such a keen interest in local matters…!

  • http://undefined local resident

    17…The whole point is that, of all those objections, whilst I respect all of them, only some were from genuine locals – most were not from “neighbours” at all (as the article you quote from mis-describes them), but were from people who live and work elsewhere and happened to drink at Foundry occasionally – in fact most were responding to a Facebook campaign. Of the Artotel supporters (57 according to your figures, and with no Facebook page to encourage them!), by contrast, virtually all of them live or work in Shoreditch. Furthermore it is unusual for people to write in support of planning proposals at all, it is usually only objectors who tend to do this. Indeed many more locals expressed support verbally, but for one reason or another did not write in by the deadline. The unusual thing about this issue was that many people who usually object to things (including myself), were coming out in support of a proposal for a change!

    Anyway the different points of view on all this have been expressed again and again, so I won’t repeat them here – I respect all points of view, however, whether I agree with them or not: it’s a pity you cannot do the same, rather than attempting to suggest that the opposite point of view from your own is somehow only held by one person, particularly when this is so obviously not the case.

    Certainly I will not stoop to personal insults of the kind you express (spouted from the anonymity of your intriguing stage name, though I have a pretty good idea who you are – there were a few giveaways in your initial rant!). I’m afraid such unpleasantness says more about you than anyone else; thankfully it is not typical of most locals, though it explains perhaps why even more of them did not want to confirm in writing their strong support for Art’otel.

    All the best, dear.

  • http://undefined local resident

    17…sorry, one more thing – at the planning meeting a clear majority (7 to 2, if I remember correctly) of councillors voted in favour of the hotel proposal. As you will know if you were there, this vote was taken by a show of hands in public (not behind closed doors or in secret, as some of the more biased press articles have tried to suggest).

    All best.

  • http://undefined lutherblissett

    Philip, what particularly grates is your continued insistence on seeing The Foundry as just another bar, when you know it was something quite different.

    The Foundry was an alternative, avante-garde space, part of the counterculture whose absence Boris Johnson is now bemoaning:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/charlottehigginsblog/2010/jul/07/boris-johnson-radical-voice

    Why do you refuse to recognize its distinct cultural identity? There’s nowhere else where you’d find such a crowd or such events. Yet you’re glad to see one of the last remaining corners of Shoreditch stamped out. Would you really like everywhere to be like Shoreditch House?

    Yes, the marauding packs of drunken stag and hen parties one finds around Old Street at the weekend are unpleasant. But these out-of-towners drank elsewhere and were never anything to do with The Foundry. You have never presented any evidence that connects the Foundry itself with problem drinking, yobbishness, etcetera. Or is your real problem with the cycle couriers, art students, poets, far-left types, old hippies, etc, who were the Foundry’s clientele? Were they just not smart enough for you?

    It might be interesting to consider Shoreditch in relation to Soho, which for all its nightlife has 2000 residents, including many in council housing around Berwick Street:

    http://es.homesandproperty.co.uk/property_news/smart_moves/sohossexynewhomes.html

    If you were living there, would you also be seeking to shut down bars and arts venues? Or would you accept that they had come first, and were part of the character of the area?

    Is there a problem specific to Shoreditch/Islington, that it gets a very different crowd to Soho? This may well be true, but again this is about stag/hen party culture.

    Another difference between the two areas is that Soho is truely mixed usage, with the film and advertising industry making it their home, whereas Shoreditch is in danger of becoming a desert, with local residents in fear of binge drinkers on the one hand, the out-of-towners populating the bars on the other, and declining creative industries left in the middle.

    But shutting the Foundry – popular haunt of many artists and creatives – and replacing it with a hotel for affluent city types will only make this problem worse.

    One final point – earlier in the thread you observed that few of the protesters seemed to be genuinely homeless. But surely if anything that would invalidate their point, since you could then say they were only occupying the building because they needed somewhere to live.

    As it is, they are there making a last stand for a building – and an alternative culture – that they believe in, and are upset to see forced out of the area. And for that, I hope you will agree, they should be applauded.

  • http://undefined Joel_B

    Luther (or whatever your real name might be, I’m guessing “Marcus”).

    1) A few days ago you were decrying someone for being a Tory. Now you’re grabbing at their scraps. I reckon you would be supping with the Devil if he said he once dropped into the Foundry for a pint…! (But such hypocrisy should be normal for someone who attacks while hiding behind a pseudonym)

    2) Soho also has a surprisingly strong Residents Community. You will notice that not much changed, even with the introduction of 24-hour drinking. This is in part due to this Community. Might be small but its influential.

    3) Its never been about “shutting the Foundry down”. This is the part that the Media has played up because it makes a good story. The Foundry has been scheduled for closure for over a year, ever since the owners of the building had considered an alternate use. (Even before locals were polled on what shape the tower should be).

    4) Shoreditch is home to a community of Creative Agencies (both Web, and Print) as well as a mix of other New Media Agencies. (Think bespoke Application Development). There’s a real vibe during the day. Its telling that you don’t realise this. (Never been further in than Old Street in the day-time…?).

    5) You might want to check the article. “Although someone is on site at all times, a lot of the occupants have their own squats to defend elsewhere”. Not exactly the definition of “homeless”.

    6) They are making a last-stand to protect a…. Business Model. The Foundry existed because of the low rents of an under-developed area attracted the money of artists. Climate changed been fixed then…? War in Afghanistan ended…?

  • http://undefined local resident

    22 – I hear you, but the problem is that things were going much too far, there were quite simply too many bars in the area. Yes, I agree that Foundry was not one of the more problematic ones, but given its prominent position and size, it is stretching it to suggest it was somehow immune from the problems and binge-drinkers which invade the area every weekend. Yes it had art displays, but its primary function was that of a bar. The type of people who go there is irrelevant to this, and I absolutely agree that other bars full of drunk yuppies can be worse!

    Whilst I understand the point you are making, my fear is that it is this sort of idealism which has allowed the situation in Shoreditch to deteriorate so badly, and allowed more and more bars to open, each claiming to be different and alternative, but in reality just adding to the problem. The reason so many locals are taking a stand is precisely because we don’t want to become like Soho (at least not the Fri/Sat night version).

    But there is hope! Shoreditch is not becoming a desert as you describe, but the non-bar side of the area is now growing. This means more residential, shops, amenities and creative businesses, which taken together make the area a sustainable urban village which has a life outside bars. However in reality this type of growth can’t really happen unless there are enough affluent people to support it, and I believe Art’otel will help, not hinder, this trend. Maybe I am being idealistic?? but I hope not. It may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but I rather like the plans, especially the inclusion of a large art gallery on the ground floor. You may cringe at the very thought of it, but each to his/her own.

    As for the squatters – yes, I do respect their principles, and as I say they seem nice enough in themselves. However they have now made their point and there are other issues (see post 6 above) which must also be considered, and therefore I’m afraid any applause is fading fast.

    Anyway there we are, I hope this makes sense and that we can at least end this chat on cordial terms – we obviously both care about the area and that in itself is a good thing, surely. My experience with local issues is that whilst most people are agreed on what they don’t want (more bars), they cannot always agree on what they do want. In a sense the whole Art’otel debate encapsulated this dilemma, and at least there were lots of people – on all sides of the argument – who cared enough to express their views. If I call this the Big Society you may accuse me of being political! so let us call it community involvement, and be thankful it still exists.

    Best regards,
    Local resident :)

  • http://denny.me Denny

    Just ran across this article… I live and work up near the top of Pitfield Street, which the Foundry stood at the bottom of, and have done for about 3 and a half years. Before that I lived just across Shoreditch High Street, and worked in Hoxton Square.

    There are plenty of all-but-identical over-priced bars around this area that I’d be happy to see closed if we need to reduce the number of drinking establishments, but the Foundry wasn’t one of them – I think it’s a real shame that it’s gone.

  • http://denny.me Denny

    Just ran across this article… I live and work up near the top of Pitfield Street, which the Foundry stood at the bottom of, and have done for about 3 and a half years. Before that I lived just across Shoreditch High Street, and worked in Hoxton Square.

    There are plenty of all-but-identical over-priced bars around this area that I’d be happy to see closed if we need to reduce the number of drinking establishments, but the Foundry wasn’t one of them – I think it’s a real shame that it’s gone.