A Driver-Free Tube Service?

1706_tube.jpg
Photo / WillStover

The Conservatives on the London Assembly have set a cat amongst the Crow(s) by proposing a driverless Tube service.

The proposal comes via a leaked memo (PDF), which has fallen on the desktop of Boris Johnson. It claims that the plan would save TfL £141m a year in wages, and — happily enough — “end the strangle-hold militant unions have on the city’s tube network and seriously curtail their ability to bring London to a standstill”.

The RMT has given the idea short shrift. A press release from the union describes it as a “lethal and ill-conceived plan to sack all tube drivers”, and said that any serious consideration of the move would be met by “all-out industrial action”. They’ve demanded direct assurances from Boris Johnson that the plan is not on the cards. TfL have released a statement in defence of their drivers, saying they “reassure passengers, provide information and help with speedy alighting”; hardly a ringing endorsement for job security.

Driverless trains have been in operation in London since the Docklands LIght Railway launched over twenty years ago, while Victoria line and Central line drivers control the door mechanism and make on-board announcements, but don’t control the train itself, facts which somewhat mitigate the RMT’s argument about safety.

However, the DLR operates a system known as ‘Driverless Train Operation’, with a member of staff present on each train, who may be called upon to take control in certain situations. The Tories’ plan calls for ‘Unattended Train Operation’, meaning that there would be no official on-board presence. Would commuters fancy waiting indefinitely for a driver to edge his or her way along the tunnel should something break down?

  • http://undefined A Londoner

    The leaked *memo* was poorly written and I have been told by someone who worked in the industry that some of the terminology used was incorrect.

    I would assume that this was a quick briefing memo put together by a junior staffer in order to be leaked to the press to gauge the reaction of the public.

    I for one am all for it! There will still be staff in the stations for passenger reassurance, and I can’t conceive of any emergency that would occur in a tunnel in which a driver would be able to provide assistance over and above that of getting the train to the next stop (which is what happens when someone pulls the passenger alarm).

    In short, a TFL which can run without the interference of Bob Crow and the RMT would be fantastic.

    For more information on automated metros see:

    http://citytransport.info/Automation.htm

  • http://undefined Chris

    Once again, self-serving unions oppose efficiency and improvements.

    I would love to see automation of trains and Bob Crow’s mafioso grip on London mitigated.

  • http://undefined ribbit

    The money saved by getting rid of drivers will be chicken feed compared to the money needed to upgrade signalling and rolling stock to enable the kind of automatic operation seen on the DLR, which is not only mainly above ground and has much smaller distances between stations than tube lines, but also has far fewer passengers. DLR trains have 3 carriages at most, whilst most tube trains have eight.

    Anyone who thinks this is feasible without a huge amount of money and yet MORE weekend closures clearly knows nothing about the Tube. I’m no fan of Bob Crow, but this idea is completely stupid.

  • http://undefined Bloomsbury

    Flood the tube, give it a strong current, then chuck some of those doughnut things in like the rapids ride at Thorpe Park.

  • http://undefined IngridK

    Yes, please call an all out industrial action in opposition to driverless Tubes. That won’t be the least bit counterproductive.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/97938415@N00/ BrigadierCrispbread

    Even as a left-winger…I’m sick of their wildcat striking…still, given yea olde tube network, it’s hard to imagine it could be feasible due to safety.

  • http://www.noisetosignal.org Tanya Jones

    Sorry to be a pedant, but they’re not wildcat strikes if they’re planned and a secret ballot held. Wildcat strikes are completely unannounced and, AFAIK, were made illegal by Thatcher, although it was a Labour government who first wanted to outlaw them in 1969.