Opera Review : Satyagraha @ ENO

SATYAGRAHA13.jpg Philip Glass, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, radicalism, puppetry, and, er, farming – the English National Opera seems to have it all in their production of Satyagraha, so drawing the crowds in shouldn’t be a problem. Keeping them there, however, is another matter…

Performing an opera in Sanskrit without subtitles – save for the occasional key phrase projected onto the set – was always going to be divisive. The promise of Phillip Glass’ score, along with the stunning set design by the Improbable theatre company (who also directed the production), tips the scales in the opposite direction though. From the outset the constantly fluctuating array of scenery does not disappoint, as creatures emerge from the darkness surrounding what once appeared to be an empty stage, and puppets are constructed from what seems like thin air to tower over the stage. Later on, yet more puppets are introduced which are made from the same newspaper which is integral to the set – and the plot – and seem somewhere between Where The Wild Things Are and Spitting Image (there’s definitely a Prescott and maybe a Straw lurking amongst the cast). Unlike the Anthony Minghella production of Madame Butterfly which took place over the summer though, these visuals are built for the medium of the theatre rather than the cinema, and engage the audience with new surprises at every scene.

Following the plot when relying purely on the visuals and the score though demands a lot from the audience, and a working knowledge of Gandhi’s early years in South Africa would save spending the first act in a perpetual state of head-scratching. Glass’ score is acoustically addictive, yet varies little in key, tone or tempo when changing from the quiet aspiration of his life on Tolstoy’s farm to the riots scenes in Durban, and thus conveys little of the drama of the narrative. Perhaps Sanskrit doesn’t lend itself to the open vowels which would allow a richer variety of sound. Thankfully the first interval provides opportunity for those who didn’t want to fork out the £5 for a programme to repent of this mistake and figure out what the hell is going on. We were not alone in our confusion it seems, although we nearly might have been, since during the interval half of the audience (and by act 3 a significant chunk of the orchestra) had left. Unfortunately for them, the later acts are far more coherent – whilst Gandhi’s links with Tolstoy may not be well known, his return to Durban, his rescue by Mrs Alexander, and the ensuing protests are conveyed powerfully, and parallels with the work of Martin Luther King are more straightforward to comprehend.

In the culminating act, MLK dons a suit to gesticulate over a podium in what seems the same manner as a bookie at Antree, in what is otherwise a stunning combination of shadowplay, music and the protagonist’s aspiration. Unfortunately, despite the Alan Oke’s rich yet seemingly effortless vocals which interplay beautifully in his solos with the orchestra, the length of the scene adds little to the plot, and the mind wanders (in much the same way as the departed audience members).

The highlights of this production are the use of sky hooks and sopranos, shadows and spindly stilts. In much the same way that it was in Gandhi’s life, the printed word is integral to the set and to the narrative. In this vein, remember to buy a programme.

At the London Coliseum, tickets £16 to £50. Runs until 26th March

Watch out for Remix this Sunday, when audience members are invited to bring a musical instrument or a set of vocal chords for the chance to create a series of unique sound loops to form a new soundscape for the evening in collaboration with New York-based musicians Sam Godin and Falu, British composer Anna Meredith, performance poet DJ Charlie Dark and a quartet of classical Indian musicians and VJs from Maskomi.

  • http://www.flaneurbanite.blogspot.com Shilpa Bhatnagar

    Hi, it’s spelled Gandhi, not Ghandi.

  • http://undefined RSBRSB

    Having seen this particular opera many times in London and New York I guess you could say I’m a big fan. However I am astonished that this critic states that “half the audience” left. This is a total, lie. SHAME ON YOU! Having attended the first night and now, tonight, the second night my front row seat was in a position to see most of the house. At the end I looked around to see no large areas unoccupied! So where all these people left from is a puzzle. Your comment on the cost of the programme is also odd. Its a glossy perfect bound book of some 41 pages / 82 printed sides. Well worth the little extra. You didn’t have to buy it, you could have picked up the two page synopsis for free! Br/

    Oh yes, I agree, you can’t spell Gandhi. If you had paid the fiver you would have know how to spell the dudes name…..

  • Lindsey

    Thanks – this has been corrected.

  • http://thesisavoider.blogspot.com/ RuthL

    Er, what? I’m confused as to what motive you think I might in writing this.

    When I went, I witnessed people clambering over each other for programmes in the first interval. The price in an observation – I’ve paid much more for much less at other productions (although Invisible Dot’s copies of the Stefan Golazewski plays are by far the most beautiful and worthwhile document I’ve ever bought in these circumstances). I had two copies of the Satyagraha programme, as it happens – but I was so concerned with not misspelling Satyagraha that I missed the common European trap of mistaking Gh/dh. He is, indeed, the dude.

    Maybe you couldn’t see from the front row, but there was a fairly hefty exodus in the first interval – admittedly “half” is an exaggeration, but I would have thought that fairly obvious. Even one critic I was sat next to gave up. By the third though, the vacant seats around us in the circle had been taken up by people who had come down from higher levels, and many of those who stayed gave a standing ovation – I guess it just depends which camp you’re in, evidently this is the Marmite of operas. So now you know what I thought of it, and I know what you thought of it, and wowzers – they’re different! Who’d have thunk it. I’m glad to hear you enjoyed it, but I assure you this review was written without grudge or ulterior motive.

  • Katriona

    I also found the opera mildly excruciating, but that was due almost entirely to the score which I think was overlong and self -indulgent. However the singers were absolutely wonderful, in spite of the plodding repetitive music (and yes, Glass is a wonderful musician, but not a dramatist–any of the opera’s movements could have been cut by a third and maintained some emotional momentum, to the benefit of artists and audience alike) the gentleman who sang the role of Ghandi was nothing short of brilliant and sustained his emotional centre under the most trying and exhausting of stagings I have ever seen in an opera. The young woman who played Ghandi’s secretary was also vividly alive and in the moment, as was the rest of the cast , and in an opera that is physically executed completely in slow motion without a single moment of spontanteity, that is high praise indeed…any success the opera has achieved is entirely to their
    credit, and that of the dedicated ensemble that makes up the chorus. I wish I could buy them all a round after the show…. they certainly deserve one. Or three. Or five…as a performer, all I could think is “this is a brutally tedious show to perform–God help them on matinee days.”