<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airport Expansion: East vs West</title>
	<atom:link href="http://londonist.com/2009/07/airport_expansion_east_vs_west.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://londonist.com/2009/07/airport_expansion_east_vs_west.php</link>
	<description>A website about London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://londonist.com/2009/07/airport_expansion_east_vs_west.php#comment-2310555</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonist.com/?p=13616#comment-2310555</guid>
		<description>The problem at Heathrow is that only 25% of travellers, have London as their final destination. The majority of travellers are going onwards to other destination. This is a bit like a busy interchange station. For instance I had a friend who are going from Barbados to Singapore, but he travelled via Heathrow. 

All this effects the quality of life people live. In the Docklands it is bad, because I suffer from aircraft noise both London City Airport and also Heathrow jet as they are overflying to start their approach....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem at Heathrow is that only 25% of travellers, have London as their final destination. The majority of travellers are going onwards to other destination. This is a bit like a busy interchange station. For instance I had a friend who are going from Barbados to Singapore, but he travelled via Heathrow. </p>
<p>All this effects the quality of life people live. In the Docklands it is bad, because I suffer from aircraft noise both London City Airport and also Heathrow jet as they are overflying to start their approach&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesu</title>
		<link>http://londonist.com/2009/07/airport_expansion_east_vs_west.php#comment-2181971</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonist.com/?p=13616#comment-2181971</guid>
		<description>You forget the increase in flights as people leave... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forget the increase in flights as people leave&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anglotopia</title>
		<link>http://londonist.com/2009/07/airport_expansion_east_vs_west.php#comment-2179991</link>
		<dc:creator>Anglotopia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonist.com/?p=13616#comment-2179991</guid>
		<description>Well, the obvious solution if for London to start sucking so that so many people don&#039;t want to go there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the obvious solution if for London to start sucking so that so many people don&#8217;t want to go there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobo04</title>
		<link>http://londonist.com/2009/07/airport_expansion_east_vs_west.php#comment-2179831</link>
		<dc:creator>cobo04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londonist.com/?p=13616#comment-2179831</guid>
		<description>Having the estuary airport has already been indicated as a safety hazard due to the possible increase of bird strike. Heathrow expansion would be safer in this aspect but would mean the destruction of an entire villiage and an 11c church plus of course the problem to the local population.

In all both locations have their bad points yet few good ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having the estuary airport has already been indicated as a safety hazard due to the possible increase of bird strike. Heathrow expansion would be safer in this aspect but would mean the destruction of an entire villiage and an 11c church plus of course the problem to the local population.</p>
<p>In all both locations have their bad points yet few good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 307/308 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d4k7s9ho8qact.cloudfront.net

Served from: londonist.com @ 2012-02-23 09:22:31 -->
