<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Londonist: Whale Whacked Following Boris Booster</title>
<link>http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php</link>
<description>All comments for Whale Whacked Following Boris Booster</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 DeanN</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:25:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>dean.nicholas@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>dean.nicholas@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>esotericbadger</title>
<link>http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1356640</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1356640</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;But hang on...  you say that it&apos;s the &apos;decision to fire an employee for biased reporting in the run-up to an election could set a new precedent&apos; - and there&apos;s no question the Guardian was doing the same.

If you do want to make facetious comparisons to Pravda* you&apos;d be better off looking at The Londoner** than the Evening Standard.

*(a state run newspaper dedicated to reporting the activities of the government in a positive light)

** (see *)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>DeanN</title>
<link>http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1356533</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1356533</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Mr. Badger - I don&apos;t think Zoe Williams  (admittedly awful) article, nor Dave Hill&apos;s online-only piece, quite equate to the spectacular campaign that Gilligan ran in London&apos;s only paid-for newspaper. Future students of political propaganda will be foregoing the old copies of Pravda and instead scanning dear Andrew&apos;s columns. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sover_99</title>
<link>http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1356524</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1356524</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;By &apos;record number of complaints&apos; I assume you mean the THREE people that complained to Ofcom. Probably Red Ken, Brian Paddick and Diane Abbott.
So because of 3 people millions of happy, satisfied listeners must forgoe their evening enjoyment.
So much for power to the people. 
Power to the beaurocrats anybody?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>driftwords</title>
<link>http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1355787</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1355787</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Well he had to go, since he was Broadcasting, i.e. over the air (and hence in Ofcom&apos;s remit), unlike AG, ZW and other presspersons, who can write what they like.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>esotericbadger</title>
<link>http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1355627</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://londonist.com/2008/05/whale_whacked_f.php#comment-1355627</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;And for the sake of balance...  Maybe Dave Hill and Zoe Williams might be found crying into their frappucinos?

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dave_hill/2008/04/the_london_list.html

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/zoe_williams/2008/05/be_afraid_be_very_afraid.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>