Bethnal Green And Bow Are On The Phone…
They Want Their MP Back

georgeawake.jpg

Well, they did vote him in last May, after all. Yes, as every Londoner knows, the eleventh and most shocking entrant into the Celebrity Big Brother house is “Gorgeous” George Galloway, cigar-chomping scourge of the right, New Labour, journalists, Christopher Hitchens, and anyone who doesn’t agree with him.

TV Troll was so surprised when the camera panned up to show his smug turnip head, we almost fell off the sofa. The thought of Galloway in the same paradigm of reality as Chantelle, the non-sleb-pretend-sleb Paris Hilton-lookalike imposter, is just … rather hard to get one’s brain around. To say the least. Although, one could add, their hunger for the acres of publicity guaranteed by a CBB appearance is pretty similar.

George’s presence will be sorely missed in Westminster; after all, he regularly strides down the Commons like a Glaswegian Cicero, fiercely haranguing incompetent and self-serving politicians of all stripes, providing a voice for his poverty-stricken constituents. Oh no, wait, sorry, we were getting confused – he’s not exactly known for his stellar voting record (“Has spoken in 4 debates since the General Election — 556th out of 646 MPs”). Maybe his absence will be missed instead.

Is his appearance on the telly a way of reaching out to disenfranchised and disaffected youth, or is it yet another piece of evidence pointing towards the fact that he is clearly completely bonkers? As is the case with reality TV – which is why we love it so much – it is up to you, the viewer, to decide. Vote him out or keep him in? TV Troll votes for allowing him to hang around for a bit yet (with apologies to any Bethnal Green and Bow residents who have pressing issues they want him to sort out) so that we can enjoy the sight of him trying to explain the complexities of his position on Iraq to Jodie Marsh. If they end up shagging in the Submarine room, we’ll be even happier.

As Chris Shaw of Channel Five says in the Grauniad:

The casting of George Galloway is a far bigger risk for Channel 4 than conniving with the rehabilitation of Michael Barrymore.

Remember that last year Gorgeous George managed to turn a brief appearance before a US congressional committee into a global publicity stunt. Just imagine what he might do with three weeks of non-stop, uncensored, 24-hour TV exposure.

We reckon more people will vote for Galloway on the telly than voted for him in the General Election, which is probably a worrying indictment of the parlous state of modern Western democracy; it’s a good thing we’re too busy mindlessly consuming the by-products of a society in terminal decline as transmitted (or not – ITV, sort your sodding digital transmitter out, please, we’re having terrible trouble at the moment) by the glowing box in the corner to give it more than a microsecond’s thought. Oh yes, and Maggot to win – you heard it here first.

Update: Why not visit this site if you want to register your displeasure at Mr Galloway’s antics?

  • ohnolookaspy

    If only he could live there permanently! What a rather shoddy MP. Going to BB House did not suprise me… I wish there were figures for how many times an MP has been on the news/papers with each time being for a different reason. I’m sure Mr Galloway would win with his attention seeking red, round face & moustache (urgh).

    Maybe the BB House could turn into an asylum afterwards? If only his wages could go towards sustaining it.

  • Griff

    I must admit, being a constituent of Bethnal Green and Bow I was pretty gobsmacked when I learned he was in.
    I actually called the House of Commons to ask who was my representative seeing as though he is on the telly. They didn’t know.
    I left a message on his office voicemail – nothing back.
    I called the Respect party and asked them if they knew who was representing me, and they have yet to get back to me.
    I have to admit I voted him in on the back of some pretty good rhetoric, and am now beginning to have my doubts. I guess we’ll have to wait and see. But above all, I am surprised that MP’s are allowed to get away with this.

  • http://www.londonist.com Jo

    As you can probably tell from the article, I’m not Galloway’s biggest fan and I’m not in the least surprised to hear that he is AWOL with no clear line of command in his absence. God, what an idiot. This article from the Grauniad – supposedly an obituary – manages to mention his sodding “historic election victory” about a million times. Self-serving twat.

  • Matt

    I’m not so sure. People are always moaning that politicians are out of touch with reality and don’t engage with people enough. Maybe George is making a genuine effort to redress that by trying to make politics interesting for the masses. If so, he’s doing something quite brave, in my opinion. That he’s also massively increasing his own public profile at the same time makes it easy to be cynical; but I say let’s give him a fair shot and see how he behaves while in the house. That said I’ve never seen this show, and I’m completely ignorant about politics, so I’m probably talking out of my sphincter.

  • Andy

    Even if you are a member a his constiuency, are you really missing his representation of you opinions over this particular period of time? I appreciate that it may be a matter of principle, but do you actually care? Personally, I think it’s rather entertaining…

  • Andy

    Even if you are a member a his constiuency, are you really missing his representation of you opinions over this particular period of time? I appreciate that it may be a matter of principle, but do you actually care? Personally, I think it’s rather entertaining…

  • Andy

    Even if you are a member a his constiuency, are you really missing his representation of you opinions over this particular period of time? I appreciate that it may be a matter of principle, but do you actually care? Personally, I think it’s rather entertaining…

  • http://www.londonist.com Jo

    Andy: Of course it’s entertaining, but that’s not really the point. I know we’re living in some kind of post-modern free-for-all society where anything goes, man, but I just can’t help thinking that Members of Parliament ought to preserve some level of … I don’t know, dignity, maybe. Does that make me sound terribly old-fashioned? Whatever, I just can’t help thinking there are better ways for him to communicate with the public than via a programme which, love it though I do, is not exactly renowned for respecting the integrity of its participants.