Silent Night for Parliament Square Carollers

caroling.jpg

Shock news: People weren’t arrested outside parliament yesterday.

Indeed, a group of carol singers, who were previously threatened with arrest under the Serious Organised Crimes and Police Act, were allowed to wassail unmolested in Parliament Square.

The law bans demonstrating without police permission within a half mile radius of the Palace of Westminster, as Maya Evans, one of last night’s carollers, found out recently when she was arrested outside Downing Street for reading out the names of those soldiers killed to date in Iraq. However, no such fate awaited her in Parliament Square last night.

The Act in question is due to come fully into force in April, with the formation of the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) to replace the National Crime Squad and National Criminal Intelligence Service. M.P.s spent two days in a Committee Room last week, simply correcting typing errors, and the Act looks to be another piece of legislation being rushed through the Commons by the government. Whilst the carollers should technically be treated as demonstrators under the Act, someone in the police force showed some common sense, and decided to turn a blind eye.

Funnily enough, the only caroller who is exempt from the reaches of the Act is Brian Haw, the guy who has been demonstrating in Parliament Square for four years now. There was a clause put into the legislation specifically to remove the “serious organised criminal” Haw from outside the front gate of the Palace. However, the High Court ruled that Mr. Haw’s protest pre-dates the legislation, and is therefore exempt from it. So whether the Act envisaged the other carollers being carted off down the nick whilst Haw sang a solo rendition of In the Bleak Midwinter, we will never know.

The 100 or so carol singers’ point that the new law is too vague was well made last night. But they could have chosen a better time: Parliament is now in recess for two weeks, so there were very few, if any, decision makers there to hear their carols and indeed their message. It was the equivalent of singing to an empty room.

Image taken from Stefz Flickr stream under the Creative Commons licence.

  • http://agathonrwasa.blogspot.com Richard

    Hi there – thanks for commenting on this event, and highlighting the bigger issues behind it.

    The main “audience” for this event was not, from my point of view at least, the MPs themselves. We don’t need to sing Christmas Carols to get through to them – we’ve got the Royal Mail and http://www.theyworkforyou.com to help us out with that. The point was to highlight this issue in the media, so that more members of the voting public are made aware of this bonkers law.

    I think that the conviction of Maya Evans for reading out the names of the dead British soldiers really galvinised a lot of people to want to do something. Tim’s Carol Concert idea quickly caught peoples’ imagination. If we’d waited until Parliament came back from its holidays then it wouldn’t have been Christmas any more! The point was to challenge the government to arrest us, live on the Six o’Clock News, for singing Christmas Carols in Parliament Square without government authorisation. If they do then it makes great television, if they don’t then we’ve shown up the law. We win either way.

    The more I’ve found out about this issue, the more bonkers it all seems to me. Maya Evans’ MP, Michael Foster, subscribes to the following gonzo conspiracy theory about why it was necessary to ban all unauthorised political statements within 1km (why are we suddenly going metric?!) of Parliament:

    “…with the current terrorist threat it would be easy to mask a terrorist atrocity under the guise of a legitimate demonstration…”

    The implication seems to be that Maya Evans had to be arrested and taken to court because her standing by the Cenotaph reading a list of names could easily have masked the commission of a terrorist atrocity. The Police who arrested her told her it was for her own safety.

    I couldn’t resist writing to Michael “here come the lizards” Foster MP to ask if he could give me a single example of when and how this might ever have happened. No answers yet.

    Foster also said that Maya Evans would not have been arrested if she had NOTIFIED the Police of her intention to demonstrate, pointing out that her fellow protestor had notified the Police and was not arrested. But as that fellow protestor points out here:
    http://www.j-n-v.org/Action/Maya_Independent_Letters_051212.htm
    …he was the organiser of the demonstration – hence his notification should have covered Maya Evans too. Previously it was not necessary for every individual participant in a demonstration invididually to notify the Police of their intention to demonstrate. If we followed the logic of Funny-farm Foster, any repeat of the 2003 antiwar protests would require upwards of 1 million invidual requests for permission to protest…